Thursday, May 26, 2016

AMERICA'S LOST HISTORY OF SOUTH TEXAS BORDER VIOLENCE

US troops in Brownsville

By Rebecca Onion
www.slate.com
A hundred years ago, in the Texas counties along the U.S.–Mexico border, a decade-long flurry of extralegal killings perpetrated by Texas Rangers, local law enforcement, and civilian vigilantes took the lives of thousands of residents of the United States who were of Mexican descent, and pushed many more across the border into Mexico. 
This record of death and intimidation, which irrevocably shaped life in those border counties, has not been commonly taught in the state’s mainstream school curricula or otherwise recognized in official state histories. Mexican-American communities, however, have preserved the memory of the violence in family archives, songs, and stories.
 “To many Mexicans, contemporary violence between Anglos and Mexicans can never be divorced from the bloody history of the Borderlands,” write William D. Carrigan and Clive Webb in their history of lynchings of Mexican-Americans. “They remember, even if the rest of the country does not.”
Belatedly, tentatively, Texas has begun to reckon with this bloody history. As election-year rhetoric around the border and Mexican immigration has reached new levels of xenophonia and racism, the state – goaded by a group of historians calling themselves Refusing to Forget – has taken steps toward commemoration of the period called "La Matanza" (“The Killing”), with an art exhibit at the Bullock Texas State History Museum and three historical markers soon to be unveiled. 
For a state that has long refused to come to terms with those years – sealing transcripts of a Congressional investigation into the killings and waxing nostalgic about the Texas Rangers despite their involvement– it’s something like progress, even if the legacy of this violence will require far more than exhibits to expiate.
The deaths that occurred between 1910 and 1920 are part of a longer history of lynching of Mexicans and Mexican-Americans in the United States– itself little-discussed in comparison with the parallel history of violence against black Americans. 
Carrigan and Webb identify waves of violence against Americans of Mexican descent in the 1850s (when Mexicans were forcibly expelled from many mining camps in California), the 1870s (when Mexicans and Americans both took to raiding farms and ranches across their respective borders), and the 1910s. While a mob’s stated reason for lynching black victims tended to be an accusation of sexual violence, for Mexicans in the United States, the reason given was often retaliation for murder or a crime against property: robbery, or what was sometimes called “banditry.”
Property – in the form of land – was the underlying cause of the Texas border violence that took place in the second decade of the 20th century. 
At the turn of the 20th century, an epic, often illegal, transfer of land began, moving ownership from Tejanos living in the border counties of Texas to newly arrived Anglo farmers and ranchers. (Because the people living through this history did not use the term “Mexican-American” to describe themselves, I’m following the lead of the Refusing to Forget historians, and using the terms “Texas-Mexicans” or “Tejanos” to describe Texas residents of Mexican descent.) 
The advent of the railroad, which reached the border city of Brownsville in 1904, made Anglo expansion onto historically Mexican land possible, seriously shifting the balance of power in the land along the Rio Grande.
This area had fallen within the borders of the United States since the middle of the 19th century, when the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American War and made the river the new boundary between the two countries. 
But it had remained culturally Mexican, with many Mexican residents staying on the ranches where they had been living – which were now, legally, located in Texas. Between the signing of the treaty and the advent of the railroad, the area was predominately Mexican, with a small number of Anglo settlers mixing into the culture, intermarrying with Tejano neighbors and learning to speak Spanish. As historian John Moran Gonzalez put it to me: “You paid your taxes in dollars, but you paid for your groceries in pesos. English was the language of government but everybody spoke Spanish.” The Border Patrol wasn’t founded until 1924; in the meantime, people went back and forth across the river easily.
After the railroad arrived, irrigation companies soon followed suit, and the Rio Grande Valley’s naturally fertile lands began to look more and more appealing to Anglo immigrants. The price of land went up, and so did taxes; Mexican ranchers found it hard to pay. “Sheriffs sold three times as many parcels for tax delinquency in the decade from 1904 to 1914 as they had from 1893 to 1903,” writes Benjamin Heber Johnson in his book Revolution in Texas: How a Forgotten Rebellion and It's Bloody Suppression Turned Mexicans Into Americans.
 “These sales almost always transferred land from Tejanos to Anglos.” 
Because records of land ownership in the region had been poorly maintained when the land was less desirable, Anglo settlers could often challenge ownership in court. If the Tejano living on the land didn’t have the funds to fight such a challenge, they ended up selling parcels in order to pay legal fees. 
Sometimes, Johnson writes, white ranchers “resorted to the simple expedient of occupying a desired tract and violently expelling previous occupants.” The end result was catastrophic for the Tejano community: Between 1900 and 1910, more than 187,000 acres of land transferred from Tejano to Anglo hands, in just two Texas counties (Cameron and Hidalgo). Many who lost their land ended up working on it, paid, not well, by its new owners.

To read the rest of this article, click on link below:

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

What one sided bull shit. Conveniently overlook are the numerous murders and massacres of Anglos by Mexicans. The Norias Ranch Raid and raids on the trains are just a few about this time.

This was indeed a violent time and was in fact a state of war with right and wrong on both sides. It is real irritating that folks with political agendas write one sided history.People read this stuff without knowing the other side and they are too lazy to dig it out for themselves.

Were Mexicans murdered by Anglos? Yes of course. Were Anglos murdered by Mexicans? Yes of course.

Stop the bull shit and tell the truth.

Anonymous said...

Were Mexicans murdered by Anglos? Yes of course. Were Anglos murdered by Mexicans? Yes of course.

Stop the bull shit and tell the truth.

May 26, 2016 at 11:32 AM


There is always two sides to every story but it is also true that history is written by the winner and not the one who lost the battle or the war. I think his point is when you have a David going against a Goliad, the strongest is the winner.
The question is, was it right? (either one, either side?) to murder mexicans or to murder whites in the name of race? in the name of "nationalism" (on either side)? We are still "fighting" eachother!! Different time, different views, SAME rethoric on each side.

Anonymous said...

Juan, we are forming an exploratory citizen's group to review all the Anglo statues and historical markers. When done, we will present our findings and recommendations to the city and county on how best to get rid of these. It's time, man. It's time.

Anonymous said...

In 1990's at homero hanna high there was a course that covered this taught by mrs. Perez think first name was rosa
Also dr Norman binder covered this at utb in late the 90's.

Anonymous said...

I say that the Border with Mexico and the United State be moved up to the San Antonio or Nueces Rivers; I mean why not, Mexico has done such a great job with what they have now.

It's difficult for any one person to come to grips with the fact that it has lost something especially a fight, ie: The Mexican-American War, much less an entire cultural area, ie: The RGV. Mexico never really challenged the lawlessness and violence that was present in the southern part of the United States, ie: Comanche and Apache tribes, they just kept sending their defrocked Mexican and Spanish aristocrats here to try and get them out of Mexico and Spain.
This area has always been and will always be a place where those who cannot make it anywhere else come to live out the rest of their pathetic lives.

Read "Empire of the Summer Moon"; by S.C. Gwynne.

Do not pretend that "Mexicans" were here first, or do not pretend that the Mexicans here in this area mixed easily with the Native Americans like in New Mexico, Arizona, Utah and Colorado.

Geronimo tried to kill every Mexican he could; Mexican soldiers killed his wife and children. His favorite was to slip in at night and kill all of the soldiers he could except one, which he would usually hamstring himself and leave him to warn the other soldiers what they may be in for.

Mexico or Mexican Americans have no more honorable way to claim this God Forsaken area than any "Anglo" does.

Like you said, this is a "forgotten place" no one wants to remember "everything that happened here". So if you really want Texas History books to tell the entire story then don't forget the brutality of the Mexican Settlers and most of all the Mexican Soldiers.

Word

Anonymous said...

The Spaniards came to Mesoamerica killing and enslaving the native population. The raped and bred with the women producing the Mestizo Mexican. The Spaniards and their Mexican offspring held large tracts of land and held a captive work force called "Peons", who were nothing more than slaves or indentured servants The Peones could not live, but for the largess of the wealthy landowner. These Mexican continued to wage was on the remaining native population and still do where the Mayans continue to resist. In the entrance to Chapultepec Palace there is a large painting showing an Aztec warrior and a Spanish soldier locked together in death. The title of the painting is "Fusion De Dos Culturas". Asi es Mejico.

The entire history of Mexico is one of violence, blood, conquest and subjugation.This character continues to play out with the Cartels and in Mexican politics. The Mexican never consider the Rio Grande River as a barrier to his violent lusts. He never accepted American control of the area and used the loss of what had been Mexico, as an excuse for his violent behavior.

No less the United States has had it's wars of conquest and domination of the native people. The Anglo empire expanded where there was opportunity, which included the RGV. There has been a fusion of cultures here in the RGV. A fusion of Mexico and the US. However some Mexican-Americans love to play the victim card,forgetting where they would be and what they would be, had not the Anglos come to this part of the world. They live in a fantasy world devoid of reality. If they desire to return to the old ways, all they have to do is walk across the bridge and take up residence in the poverty ridden, dirty, free fire zone called Matamoros Mexico. They should note that anybody over there with the resources to do so, have moved over here. If the US should ever do away with the Investor Visa, those folks would have to move back, where they Cartel thugs would pick over their corpses.

It is trite to say that RGV Mexicans should get over their imaginary victim status and embrace both cultures, taking the best from each and rejecting the worse. They can be Mexican-Americans or American-Mexicans, it matters not, but this stilly culture conflict is in nobody's interest.

I find it noteworthy and very hypocritical that many Mexicans fault the Neo-Confederates for not being willing to put the past behind them, when they themselves are not willing to do the same thing.

Adelante juntos!

Anonymous said...

A committee has been formed to identify all memorials, signage and streets named after Mexicans. It is time to cleanse Brownsville of this awful heritage. If anybody wants to be a part of this, please sign up at fuckthegreasers.org.

Anonymous said...

Lighten up Juanito. Write about the present and future. Not our LONESOME DOVE past.

Anonymous said...

This is Mexican land, always has been. To believe otherwise is to ignore reality. 6:31 A.m. commenter, are you impaired?

Anonymous said...


All written and oral histories are false, even the Bible.

Anonymous said...

Juan, you think Capt. Bob would have been pistol-whipped by the marauding Anglos had he been alive back then? I say, "hell, yeah," and he would have been gang-raped by big-butt loving Buffalo soldiers. Ja ja ja Vato jaiboso!!!

Anonymous said...

What a sad and pathetic life you live, Duardo. Reduced to posting juvenile crap on the blogs all day long.Get help , stop trying to best Roman Perez as the worst Internet pest.

Anonymous said...

"This is Mexican land, always has been. To believe otherwise is to ignore reality. 6:31 A.m. commenter, are you impaired?"

Well puto take a look at the flag flying over all governmental buildings federal, state, and municipal. It isn't that pinche eagle with the pinche snake in it's beak. This isn't Mexican land huarachero, this is America.

All the veterans were not fighting for Mexico ass hole. If you don't like it here, go back to your primos in Mexico. You are not needed here.

Anonymous said...

Evidently real historical fact is remiss with your account of what the history of the RGV really is. The place has been and always will be a transition zone, nothing more. You can called it what you want, but if Mexico really wanted this ARMPIT of place they should come and take it back. In the meantime thousands of Mexicans daily are flocking out of the real Mexico, and you think removing some statues of anglos I going to make a difference.
Well go ahead, take down some fucking statues, have a parade.
But when the cheese line starts you will line up like you always do.

Anonymous said...

"Why can't we all just get along"...Rodney Rey

Anonymous said...

Most of the juvenile comments are by the Deadbeat Diego Lee Rot, AKA James Barton, Jr., the food stamps clown.

Anonymous said...

Was not Jim Barton the troll behind the names Jake/Ren/Ralphy/Jude?

rita