Tuesday, September 15, 2026

ON THE EVE OF HER B'VILLE EVENT, GINA RIDING BLUE WAVE

By Edgar Sandoval
New York Times
Photographs by Christopher Lee
Reporting from San Antonio and Beeville, Texas

When Gina Hinojosa, a Democratic state lawmaker with a progressive record, decided to run for Texas governor last year, many people — including some Hispanic voters she will need to win — were skeptical.

“Pa’ que?” she was asked over and over. “For what?”

Gov. Greg Abbott, a third-term Republican, seemed unbeatable. He sat on a sizable campaign war chest and could rely on a well-tuned campaign infrastructure that has helped keep him in office for more than a decade. He had already faced a better-known, better-funded Democratic challenger four years ago, Beto O’Rourke, and easily defeated him.

“The conventional wisdom is that no one can beat Greg Abbott,” Ms. Hinojosa said in an interview. She said she had entered the race because she saw no other Democrat willing to do so.

“I decided I needed to try,” she said.

Even in year where Democratic optimism in Texas runs high, Ms. Hinojosa, a state representative, faces a daunting challenge. She has little name recognition outside her safely Democratic district in Austin and has struggled to raise the funds needed to compete with Mr. Abbott. He has outspent her by more than 10-to-1 and still had about 20 times as much money in his campaign account at the end of the most recent filing period, in mid-July. That financial disadvantage has hampered her efforts to introduce herself to Texans across a state where it is notably expensive to campaign.

Republican political consultants in Texas are dismissive of her chances.

“It’s wholly unrealistic that Gina Hinojosa has any credible chance at victory,” said Anthony Holm, a Republican strategist.

But the hope that reliably returns for Texas Democrats every four years has found new life in the governor’s race. The reason is a surprising polling trend: Ms. Hinojosa has repeatedly appeared within striking distance of the governor.

Texas Democrats have been here before. In 2010, a few summer polls suggested a competitive race between Bill White, a Democrat, and Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican. By the fall, Mr. Perry was consistently leading in the polls, and he won by nearly 13 points. In 2022, several polls had Beto O’Rourke just five points behind Mr. Abbott. Democrats believed then, too. But Mr. Abbott’s polling lead grew in the fall, and Mr. O’Rourke lost by nearly 11 points.



“Greg Abbott is facing the most challenging election of his career,” said Mark Jones, a political science professor and pollster at Rice University. “Right now you have voters who are unhappy about Abbott and unhappy with Trump, but don’t know much about Hinojosa other than that she’s the Democratic candidate.”

In the past few months Mr. Abbott has avoided mentioning her name, instead choosing instead to attack James Talarico, the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and warning Republicans about the broader threat posed by Democrats. But in recent weeks, the Abbott campaign has begun regularly attacking Ms. Hinojosa and her record, focusing in particular on her support for the rights of transgender and LGBTQ+ children and youth.

“From prosecuting parents who ‘misgender’ their own child to voting in favor of Texas public schools transitioning kids behind parents’ backs, Hinojosa is a rubber stamp for the Socialist Democrats and their gender insanity.” said Eduardo Leal, a press secretary for the governor’s campaign.

Ms. Hinojosa, who has described herself as a progressive in the past, now favors the term “populist,” she said in the interview. “It is no longer progressive versus moderate,” she said of the 2026 election. “It is about: Are we going to have candidates who are going to work for the people?”

A major question facing Democrats across Texas, including Ms. Hinojosa, is whether Latino voters, particularly men who supported President Trump in 2024, will return to the Democratic Party this November.

At a recent event in San Antonio, organized by the Latino Victory Fund and called “Latinas for Gina Hinojosa,” Orlando Ventura, 21, was among a small group of Hispanic men cheering her on.

“I don’t see a lot of Latinos supporting her, but I want to see more,” Mr. Ventura said.

Ms. Hinojosa has received support from fellow Democrats in an effort to raise her profile and introduce her to Democrats across the state. She ate tacos with former President Barack Obama and Mr. Talarico in Austin in May.

But her lack of name recognition was clear at a Democratic event last month in Beeville, near Corpus Christi, where Ms. Hinojosa appeared alongside Mr. Talarico and Bobby Pulido, a Tejano star running for a South Texas congressional seat.

Bea Martinez, 65, a retired educator, said she knew about Mr. Pulido and Mr. Talarico but was unfamiliar with Ms. Hinojosa.

“I don’t know much about her, but I am fed up with Abbott,” Ms. Martinez said. “I voted for him in the past, but I think it’s time for someone new.”

For Ms. Hinojosa, such voters represent both the challenge and the opportunity of her campaign: Texans who know little about her but may be open to someone other than Mr. Abbott. Like other Democrats nationwide, she is trying to harness voter anger over the cost of living and the growth of data centers, which voters blame for rising electricity prices and water use. She has also looked to differentiate herself as a Texas Democrat.

Ms. Hinojosa has made public schools and concerns over affordability centerpieces of her campaign. She has called Mr. Abbott’s $1 billion program to help parents pay for private school a “scam.”

If elected, she said, she would push for legislation to authorize $1,500 checks for every household, paid for out of the state’s rainy-day fund. (The state’s account holds a record balance of about $27 billion.)

She also opposed the growth of data centers in Texas, an issue that has rocketed up the priority list for voters from both parties. She is skeptical of Mr. Abbott’s recent order to pause the approval of such centers until the state conducts an audit to study how much water and energy the centers require to operate.

“If he wanted to protect people from data centers, he would call a special session today until we can pass laws and have real protections in place for people,” she said, adding that that was something she would do as governor.

Her message resonated with Adelfa Reyna, a retired teacher from San Antonio. “We could see the first-ever Latina governor of Texas,” Ms. Reyna said. “Republicans have had control of the state for 30 years, and Abbott has been governor for 12. It’s time for change.”

WARNING: IF YOU GET AN EMAIL ASKING YOU TO OPEN A FILE FROM ME PLEASE DELETE

 IF YOU GOT THIS, PLEASE DELETE:

(They're at it again. Please disregard and delete if you get an email asking you to open a file with that address. It may expose the content of your private  email files to the hackers. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. They never stop.) 

ENJOY TACOS, WIN A FEW BUCKS, AND BECOME A MEMBER

1801 Veterans Boulevard, Brownsville

MOBILIZE! ABBOTT IS TOAST! SUPPORT BROWNTOWN'S GINA TODAY!

 




USS TRUMP: CIRCLING URANUS AND WIPING OUT KLINGONS

CURSES, FOILED AGAIN: SCOTUS NIXES TRUMP'S RIGGING MAIL-IN VOTE


By Peter Charalambous
ABC News

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration's attempt to limit mail-in voting for now, keeping in place a lower court decision blocking the U.S. Postal Service from implementing new restrictions.

"The Government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the District Court's preliminary injunction," the ruling said.

The ruling clears the way for states to continue sending out mail-in ballots as planned ahead of the midterms.

President Donald Trump, who has pushed unfounded claims of widespread mail ballot fraud, wants states to report to USPS basic voter information, such as a voter's name and home address, attached to a unique barcode on every mail-in ballot distributed. Postal workers would then only deliver ballots addressed to voters who appear on the state-provided list.

The Trump administration has insisted the rules would impose only "modest" ballot design and review requirements on states and that a requirement to submit name, address, and barcode information of intended recipients was not onerous or intrusive.

Democratic-led states and voter advocacy groups have argued that the new USPS regulations are an attempt by the Trump administration to federalize elections, which are historically and constitutionally managed by each state, and make it harder to vote by mail for everyday citizens.

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented from the majority, saying they would have allowed the Trump administration to carry out its plan to impose new regulations on mail-in voting.

While Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the majority, he based his decision largely on the timing of the legal challenge -- less than two months from the midterms – rather than the Trump administration’s argument about the authority of the Postal Service.

“In my view, based on the briefing the Court has received at this interim stage, there is at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service’s statutory authority,” he wrote. “ But applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections.”

Monday's ruling likely ensures that states can continue mailing out ballots for the midterms as planned, though the legal battle over ballot restrictions has effectively been punted to the 2028 election. Based on the decision, at least three justices are open to the Trump administration’s arguments for the next time this case or a similar one returns to the high court.

Monday, September 14, 2026

BUT TRUMP DOESN'T MIND THAT PUTIN CONTINUES HIS WAR AGAINST UKRAINE, TARGETS CIVILIANS, DESTROYS POWER GRID

Special to El Rrun-Rrun

Russian airstrikes and drone attacks continue to hit Ukrainian cities and towns, killing civilians and damaging power grids ahead of winter.

Recent Attacks and Casualties

Latest Strikes: Yesterday Russian bombardments killed at least eight to nine civilians and wounded dozens across multiple regions.

Impacted Areas: Drones and missiles hit residential areas in Zaporizhzhia, Kryvyi Rih, Kramatorsk, and a grocery store in the Zhytomyr region.

Infrastructure: Attacks frequently target energy networks, water systems, and housing units to disrupt civilian life.

CALLING ALL SCORPIONS! CELEBRATE 100 YEARS OF TSC NURTURING EDUCATION IN SOUTH TEXAS TODAY

IF GUERRA WINS NOV. 3, HE WILL BE THE HIGHEST PAID CAMERON COUNTY JUDGE IN HISTORY, BUT WILL SACRIFICE FUTURE SALARY HIKES THE NEXT 4 YEARS JUST FOR US. WOW.


THE 444.5-ACRE SPACEX DISANNEXATION: THE VOTE THAT WON'T GO AWAY, AND TAXES THAT THE CITY WILL LOSE


Special to El Rrun-Rrun

Brownsville lost Linde from its city taxing jurisdiction. A huge taxable manufacturer in Brownsville Industrial Park

And Linde is only one company.

Brownsville gave up jurisdiction over approximately 444.45 acres of strategically located property near the Port and ship channel, most of it already zoned heavy industrial. SpaceX wanted the property for expansion.

Now look at what industrial development can be worth. A real project proposed nearby shows the scale: Saronic’s planned Port Alpha shipyard was described as a $3.2 billion investment.

Using Brownsville’s roughly 0.60 percent city property-tax rate as a simple illustration, we get this. And this is just from one company (Linde) investing on a $3 billion project, according to the commissioner himself:

$500 million taxable value = about $3 million a year
$1 billion = about $6 million a year
$2 billion = about $12 million a year
$3 billion = about $18 million a year
$4 billion = about $24 million a year


Those figures are examples, not a claim that all 445 acres would reach those values.

In return, Brownsville received an agreement for up to $220 million for water and wastewater infrastructure: $40 million initially, followed by six $30 million quarterly payments.

That’s the comparison.

Brownsville got: up to $220 million.

Brownsville lost: Linde from its city taxing jurisdiction, jurisdiction and zoning control over 444.45 acres, and the ability to collect future city property taxes from taxable development on that land while it remains outside Brownsville.

The $220 million has an end.

The tax base Brownsville surrendered could have produced revenue year after year for decades.

And that’s the part of  City Commissioner Tino Villarreal’s explanation doesn’t make disappear.

TRUMP'S MELANIA IS SLOVENIAN, USHA VANCE'S KIN ARE FROM INDIA, AND THEY HATE DIVERSITY?

Special to El Rrn-Rrun

Trump reportedly said while he was in Ireland: “Our country wasn’t built on diversity.”
That’s an extraordinary thing to say about a country built on Indigenous land, with the forced labor of enslaved Africans, and transformed by generation after generation of immigrants, including millions of Irish Americans.

You can argue about immigration policy.
You can argue about DEI.
But America’s history isn’t a political talking point. His own mother was an immigrant from Scotland. His father's family was from Germany

Diversity didn’t suddenly arrive in America. It helped create America.


 

Sunday, September 13, 2026

"WE'RE MOVING ON UP! LIKE THE JEFFERSONS...

(Ed.'s Note: In a pinch, when you lack a big Dodge Ram pickup truck like the one at left, a Nissan sedan will have to do, we guess. We gotta to hand it to the guy driving the car seen by one of our seven readers at the intersection of Price and Paredes roads and hope the roof didn't cave in before he got to his destination. Would you have dared try this? We don't think we would. Quien sabe.)

LET'S GIVE A BIG BROWNTOWN WELCOME TO OUR NEXT TEXAS GOVERNOR!

 

IT'S IN THE MAIL, MAGAS! YOU WILL GET FOOLED AGAIN! NO! NO!

Saturday, September 12, 2026

SEEING THE WRITING IN THE POLLS, ICE SENT TO INTIMIDATE VOTERS


By Jeff Helfgott

ICE agents showed up at polling sites in San Antonio and Syracuse—so Democrats just filed the first lawsuit in the country to stop it.

The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court in Washington, D.C., names Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and David Venturella, the acting head of ICE, and it is the first case in the country trying to stop federal agents from being sent to voting sites.

The Civil War-era statute it leans on bars ordering troops or armed men to "any place where a general or special election is held," with a single exception: to repel armed enemies of the United States.
The penalties are fines, imprisonment and disqualification from holding office.

Mullin told reporters that Democrats were fearmongering and that ICE is not patrolling polls.
"The only reason why we would be at polling places is if there is a threat to that polling place," he said, "or we're serving a warrant."

He also said this in a statement: "Honestly, if you're not a citizen you shouldn't be voting anyways so technically there shouldn't be illegals at the polling spot."

The complaint lists what has already happened. In May, armed agents "swarmed" the parking lot of an open polling site in San Antonio and detained a person in plain view of voters until the county sheriff ordered them to leave.

In June, ICE agents walked into a polling site in Syracuse, New York, and interrogated an election volunteer about a social media post she had written five months earlier about the fatal ICE shooting of a woman in Minneapolis.

The complaint also notes that ICE has detained more than 170 U.S. citizens.

Denver's election office has already scheduled training for election workers on how to identify federal agents in plain clothes, document their presence and de-escalate.

The complaint says rumors of armed agents at polls have made recruiting election judges harder, and losing large numbers of them mid-cycle would slow the count.

A TEXAS RANGER IN THE RIGHT, JUST KEEPS ON COMING...

YUMMY, YUMMY, YUMMY, WE'VE GOT ELKS BURGERS IN OUR TUMMY!

A NIGHT IN THE LIFE OF AN UNWELL, ERRATIC MAN; YOUR PRESIDENT

Friday, September 11, 2026

VETS MEMORIAL H.S. LOWERED FLAG FOR DOLLY, BUT NOT FOR 9/11, JUST CORRECTED.

(One of our seven readers says he was surprised that the flag at Veterans Memorial High School was not flown at half staff today in memory of the victims of the terrorist attacks on 9/11. He said that they remained at half staff for a week to commemorate the passing of country singer Dolly Parton. Makes you wonder about our priorities. Does the board Brownsville Independent School District have a uniform policy on these matters or is it left to up to the individual schools' administrators discretion to decide? If any day deserves to be observed we would think 9/11 would be at the top of the list.) 

OOPS!
(Less than half an hour after we posted about the flags, Memorial H.S. personnnel were observed lowering them, apparently in response to one of our readers calling the district's attention to the matter. Thanks BISD and God bless America!)

ITS BEEN 25 YEARS SINCE WE LOST 3,000 FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS...NEVER FORGET THEM


 

I IGNORED THE NEEDS OF OUR VIEJITOS FOR THE LAST 8 YEARS BUT NOW I NEED THEIR VOTE AND I LOVE THEM! BELIEVE ME!



Special to El Rrun-Rrun

TINO VILLARREAL'S DRAWN OUT PROTEST: LA MISMA GATA, PERO REVOLCADA

Special to El RRUN-RRUN

COMING TO A PODCAST NEAR YOU...

AND THE UNFORGIVING FALLOUT...

BEWARE OF CONS BEARING GIFTS: TRUMP'S AMAIZING $5,OOO DIVIDEND

Maize maze?
By Georgios Lefkakis

I read something very familiar this morning.
Two nights ago, in Dallas, Trump promised a $5,000 dividend to every adult American — but only if Republicans win the November midterm elections.
He called it the “Trump Dividend.”

First, the numbers:
The total cost is estimated at more than $1 trillion. For comparison, the United States has already spent $1.27 trillion on debt interest alone this year. And the annual deficit is approaching $1.8 trillion.
Trump said it would be funded by tariffs — which brought in roughly $154.5 billion during the first 10 months of fiscal year 2026.

In other words: he is promising $1 trillion with $154 billion in revenue.

The gap?
$846 billion.
Where does that come from?

Debt.
Debt that the children of today’s voters will eventually have to carry.
And this is where the story starts to feel very familiar to anyone who remembers Greece in the 1980s.
Andreas Papandreou did not say, “Vote for me and I’ll give you $5,000.”

The mechanism was different: higher wages and benefits, expansion of public-sector employment and a state increasingly supported by borrowing.

Without a sufficiently strong productive base underneath it, the debt accumulated.
Decades later, Greece entered its sovereign-debt crisis.

The comparison is not exact. The countries, currencies, institutions and circumstances are very different.
But the systems lesson is worth remembering:
A government can distribute purchasing power much faster than an economy can create productive capacity.

The United States also has an advantage Greece never had.
The dollar is the world’s dominant reserve currency, and the U.S. operates the largest economy in the world.
That gives Washington considerably more room to borrow and finance deficits.
But it does not repeal arithmetic.
And there is another reason to be skeptical.

In November 2025, Trump had already floated a $2,000 tariff dividend.

Before that came the proposed $5,000 “DOGE dividend.”

Neither became a $5,000 check sent to every American adult.

Now the number is $5,000 again — this time attached to an electoral outcome.
That is where economic policy and electoral politics become very difficult to separate.

The lesson Greece learned the hard way was not that governments should never support households.
It was that promises eventually have to connect to something underneath them:
production, productivity, tax revenue, investment, or sustainable borrowing capacity.

You can postpone that accounting.

You cannot eliminate it. he economy eventually asks where the money came from.

Thursday, September 10, 2026

I WAS AT GROUND ZERO, WE HAVE THE GREATEST ECONOMY, I SAVED VICTIMS AT THE TWIN TOWERS

 


BROWNSVILLE'S OWN NATIVE DAUGHTER GINA IS NECK-TO-NECK WITH ABBOTT FOR GOVERNOR OF EL TEJON

THE LORD IS MY STRENGTH AND SHIELD...AGAINST B'TOWN PUBLIC: IS RELIGION, LIKE PATRIOTISM, THE LAST REFUGE?


GARZISTA WARS AGAINST PORFIRIATO FOMENTED IN S. TEXAS

By Juan Montoya

Pick up any history book of the area and it’s a sure bet that you won’t find any mention of Catarino Garza. In fact, until President Manuel Lopez Obrador unveiled a monument to him last year, about the only recognition given in his native Matamoros is a small meeting room in the municipal palace (City Hall) bearing his name.

Yet, it the years between the mid-1880s and 1892, the so-called “Garzista Wars” were the talk of South Texas and northern Mexico, not to mention Mexico City and Washington D.C.

According to Texas Online, Catarino Erasmo Garza was born outside of Matamoros Nov. 25, 1859 to J. Encarnación and María de Jesús Rodríguez de la Garza. He was educated at Gualahuises, Nuevo León, and San Juan College, Matamoros, and served in the National Guard at Port Plaza.

Ignacio Zaragoza defeated the French at Puebla May 5, 1862, when Catarino was three. Five years later, when he was eight, the emperor Maximilian was executed in Guanajuato by the forces of Benito Juarez.

On the U.S. side, the Civil War erupted in 1861 and continued until 1865, allowing the French a free hand in Mexico; Lincoln telling his generals that he preferred to “fight one war at a time.”

During the period from 1859 to 1870, before Garza was in his teens, the U.S. and South Texas authorities were besieged by Juan Nepomuceno "Cheno" Cortina in retaliation for abuses against Mexican-Americans by Texas Anglos in the Brownsville area.

In 1876, Porfirio Diaz had overthrown Sebastian Lerdo de Tejada, the constitutional president of Mexico. Lerdo de Tejada had succeeded Juarez after his death and later won the election. When Diaz revolted, Lerdo de Tejada went into exile in New York and never returned to Mexico.

On June 19, 1880, Garza married a Brownsville woman whom he later divorced in 1889. In 1890 Garza married Concepción González, the daughter of a Duval County rancher, with whom he had a daughter. Between 1877 and 1886 he lived in Brownsville, Laredo, and San Antonio and visited Mexico City.

Elliot Young, in his book "Catarino Garza's Revolution on the Texas-Mexico Border,"said Garza also lived in St. Louis, Mo. where around 1885 he was appointed Mexican consul, a post he held for a short time. In St. Louis he worked on La Revista Mexicana. While in St. Louis, he was angered by an Anglo lawyer who said that “One white life is worth 10 Mexicans.”

He promoted Sociedades Mutualistas and helped found two of them in Brownsville (Hidalgo and Juarez), Laredo, and others in Corpus Christi in 1880, 1884, and 1888, respectively. Up until the late 1960s, these buildings still stood in Brownsville.

Over the next 30 years after Diaz took office in 1867, he ruled Mexico as president or as the power behind the presidential seat. It was after the generally recognized fraudulent re-elections of Diaz that Garza started calling for revolution against the regime. However, while in the United States, he also witnessed racism against Mexican-Americans and condemned racist Anglo Texans and Mexican police alike.

He was the target of two assassination plots because of his articles on “El Libre Pensador” against Coahuila Gov. Garza Galan. He “antagonized all sides by criticizing everyone,” wrote Young. For his part, Garza wrote that Diaz and his collaborators “are not the country, nor the laws, nor the people; but are truly only servants.”

In 1877, he said that when Mexico came under Diaz was: “The moment when the sun disappeared and oppression reigned.” He also said in his autobiography La Logica de los Hechos: “Mi pluma no sabe pintar, pero si reproducir, fotografiar y estampar verdades (My pen does not know how to paint, but knows how to reproduce, photograph, and imprint truths).”

Also in 1877, he served 31 days in Maverick County Jail on a charge of libel. That year, he was in Corpus Christi to found the club Politico Mutualista and newspaper El Comercio Mexicano.
In 1890, Francisco Diaz Sandoval, a Chilean citizen fomenting revolution in Mexico and an exile in Laredo, invited Catarino Garza, Ignacio Martinez, and border journalist Paulino Martinez, to launch an invasion of northern Mexico.

The force entered Mexico at Guerrero, Tamps., on June 24. Mexican forces confronted them and sent them back across the Rio Grande, where the U.S. government, under pressure from the Diaz regime, charged them with violating neutrality laws.

During a trial in San Antonio, evidence indicated that Diaz had paid Laredo police chief Gen. Bernardo Reyes $2,000 to kidnap witnesses, plant evidence, and to provide false testimony and payoffs to witnesses. During the trial, no proof was introduced that they had taken guns to Mexico, and showed that the group had been infiltrated by spies.

Descendants of some of these men still remember vividly that as a result of their participation in the invasion, many of them lost their families, ranches and suffered imprisonment on the U.S. side.

In July, 1890, Dr. Ignacio Martinez met Catarino Garza at Palito Blanco, Tx., near San Diego. Martinez was a medical doctor who lived in Brownsville and operated an anti-Diaz newspaper. A few months later, on February, 1891, Martinez was gunned down on the streets of Laredo.

Garza continued his collaborations in northern Mexico and South Texas, and by 1891 he and his associates planned an invasion to overthrow of the Díaz regime. They crossed the border in an attack and issued a manifesto in September 1891 near Río Bravo in Tamaulipas.
While his revolution was directed against Mexican president Porfirio Díaz, much of his work forming mutualistas and writing for Spanish-language newspapers was aimed at defending the interests of Mexicans in Texas.

Conflict with Mexican, United States, and Texas authorities ensued in the Garza War, which Garzistas continued after Garza left Texas. What made it difficult for the authorities on both sides was the fact that the Garzistas enjoyed popular support from residents and some authorities on both sides of the border.

In documents seized by U.S. and Mexican authorities, it was revealed that not only did Garza have the support of officers high in the Mexican military, but enjoyed material and moral support from influential ranchers in U.S. and northern Mexico and elected officials and state and federal law enforcement authorities on the Mexico and Texas side.

Afraid for his safety, Garza and his brother Encarnacion left the state in 1892 and from there he traveled to various places, including Nassau, Jamaica, and Cuba. He met with Cuban revolutionary Jose Marti, but Marti was attempting to get Diaz's support for his liberation movement in Cuba, and they did not collaborate.

(Marti, by the way, has a monument erected in his honor in Washington Park in Brownsville.)

By March 28, 1893, he moved to Matina, near Limón, Costa Rica, and a San José press published his pamphlet indicting the Díaz regime, La Era de Tuxtepec en México o Sea Rusia en América. Garza participated in a revolutionary uprising in Colombia. Official sources report that he was killed in storming the jail at Bocas del Toro, Colombia (now in Panama), on March 8, 1895.

He was never able to return to South Texas, and it wasn't until three years later – in 1898 – that Cuba threw off the Spanish yoke only to be colonized by the United States.

Diaz was overthrown in by the Revolution of 1910, 15 years after Garza's death.
He was, by any measure, a man ahead of his time.

TRUMP'S BRIBE TO REPUBLICANS: $5,000 IF THEY KEEP CONGRESS RED


Special to El Rrun-Rrun

During the RNC midterm convention, President Donald Trump gave voters a financial incentive to vote for Republicans in the midterms.

About an hour into his speech, Trump said that if Republicans win the House and the Senate he'll issue a $5,000 dividend check to millions of Americans because of the economic prosperity the country will experience.

Trump said America was making "so much money" that he was able to promise Americans thousands of dollars in the future.Trump is promising every adult American a $5,000 “dividend” if Republicans win the midterms. Estimated price tag: about $1.35 TRILLION. Tiny problem: presidents don’t control the federal checkbook. Congress does. Also, where is that money coming from for this election bribe?

"Because of our tremendous strength and success economically, I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000," Trump said. "Very much like a successful company will do a cash distribution to its shareholders."

Trump added that the dividend must be spent in the United States of America, saying he doesn't want people going to Canada, China or Germany to spend the money. It's unclear how the government would monitor the spending of the dividends.

"If the Republicans win, you win with us, and you get $5,000. It will be called the Trump dividend," Trump said.

Wednesday, September 9, 2026

EL RRUN-RRUN TOPS 19 MILLION AND GOING FOR 20 MILLION

THE MEDAL OF HONOR, NOBEL PRIZE WINNER, WINNING...

BREAKING: a photo has emerged bolstering President Trump's claim that he was at 'ground zero' on 9/11.



THE DOCTOR SAYS
 

TSC HOSTS MEXICAN CONSULATE 16 DE SEPTIEMBRE FEST THIS SATURDAY (12)

A CENTURY OF NURTURING EDUCATION IN OUR COMMUNITY

100 years. Generations of Scorpions. Join us September 14 for TSC Generations Day! 

rita