Tuesday, October 1, 2013

COUNTY NOT PREPARED FOR WIND-POWER TURBINES

By Juan Montoya
Wind power first came to the Buffalo Ridge area in southwest Minnesota in early 2000.
Like Texas and other states, Minnesota was under a federal mandate that at least 10 percent of its energy be derived from renewable resources such as wind, solar and/or biomass.
But unlike Texas, the Gopher State took the mandate seriously and set about to address the challenges posed by having wind turbines suddenly pop out across the landscape.
The Buffalo Ridge, actually an escarpment rising from the flat farmland in Murray County, is just about the only high place for miles in the flat lands of Minnesota. However, its rising slopes provided the perfect elevation to harvest what wind there was available.
Unlike South Texas, where predominantly Southeast winds come in from the Gulf of Mexico in the summer and northern blasts whip through in the winter, its "wind budget" is somewhat limited. They, as they are wont to do, settled for the next best thing, building atop the ridge.
But they weren't satisfied with that. The folks in Minnesota figured that simply taxing the turbines for the limited real estate they physically occupy would not distribute the benefits across their communities and would simply benefit the turbine companies that would in turn sell the energy produced to utilities seeking to meet the federal requirements.
The state quickly set about to establish an energy production tax that would benefit school districts, municipalities, villages and counties where they were erected. With that in place, the income started coming in to the affected areas. The way they figured, if the communities were going to put up with the massive structures that would one day dot the landscape, they should get something in return. Last year, that amounted to some $4.5 million in Murray County, in the middle of the state.
However, it didn't end there. Murray County, for example, as did other counties, drafted a wind-energy ordinance that specifies the size, placement, environmental consideration and construction guidelines for the erection of the turbines.
I think of this as I read the front-page story in the Brownsville Herald where turbines are being proposed for rural Cameron County out by the county airport. The county has no guidelines for these structures other than concerns by individual commissioners.
And a cursory search of the City of Brownsville building code indicates that it contains nary a word about the construction, placement and requirements for the erection of wind turbines. Neither does the county's subdivision ordinance.
In fact, the only mention of towers relates to height restrictions that would interfere with airplane traffic.
And nowhere in the State of Texas is there a provision to allow communities to tax the energy produced by these companies to benefit the communities where they alight.
We can talk about the benefit's of renewable energy until we're blue in the face. But until we codify their existence here, we will be behind the eight ball at the mercy and whim of these new industries with nothing but the structures to show for it.

5 comments:

Batman said...

so let me see if i get this straight, whos minding the store or driving the bus or car or truck? no one it seems so city of brownsviille and cameron county staffers, if you need to create these new ordinances or laws to allow this kind of development and be ready when these developers come knocking on your door? be prepared. lets get rolling folks dont want to miss out on this great investment opportunity to create more taxes for all entities. why not try to help out the common folks for change.

Anonymous said...

don't go too far; look at Rio Hondo;north;there are least 100 of then on the open fields/range;
let hope the County(Pete&i love you too, Daivd)don't get their hands
in this business; to line their pockets; like the go no where Toll 550(CCRGMA);then they can have 3(three) pay checks

Anonymous said...

Cameron County is not prepared for anything progressive. The Commissioners all prefer things to be "like they have always been". Cameron County lost the opportunity for wind turbines a few years ago because P.U.B. nixed their development....because the Port was involved. P.U.B. obviously was already involved with the natural gas power plant and sought to limit competition. We have backward thinking and that is what keeps the county backward and poor.

Anonymous said...

so,TRUE;THE COUNTY KEEPS ON TRYING TO PLEASE THE WRONG SIDES;LIKE ONE OF THE ( WE CAN DO IT IN HOUSE)SAN JOSE RANCH RD PROJECT;BLIND LEADING THE BLIND;WE PUTING THE CART BEFORE HORSE,WE HAVE A 4(FOUR) MILLION $ PROJECT,AND HAVE ONLY 2 (TWO) TO MAKE IT GO;
KNOWING THE WAY THE COUNTY WORKS,WE WILL TRY TO SAVE PENNIES TO WASTE DOLLARS,AND OLD SAYING,
HURRY UP AND WAIT; THE BEST THING THE COUNTY CAN DO,IS TO CONTRACT IT OUT, AND GO OUT FOR BIDS,IF WE KEEP THE SAME FOREMANS DOING SAME JOB THEY DID IN CAMERON PARK(WHERE THEY RAN OVER BUDGET)AND HAD TO PULL MONEY FROM ALL THE PCT.S TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT;

el chupacabara said...

Is it me or do i really see that the city and county staffers just dont want to work at all? cus if thats the case then just hang a sign on the door that reads please dont bother me with any new projects. GO AWAY. good day

rita