BARTON TAKES TY, THE HOLLER, TO TASK ON PARK

By Jim Barton

MeanMisterBrownsville

Brownsville Herald reporter Ty Johnson's article "Park May Be Election Issue,"contains several inaccuracies as well as misleading statements.
Understanding that Ty likely does not write his own headlines or subheadings, please note the subheading:
"Some fume over sale agreed to in 2013"

Ty: "As dozens spoke out against the sale, which was essentially agreed to in 2013, they also noted the upcoming city elections in May, almost as a warning to the commissioners sitting at the hearing with terms expiring this spring."
MMB: The tone of this subheading implies that some locals are bellyaching over something they should have spoken up about in 2013. 

Actually, Lincoln Park was first put on the agenda February 25, 2013 as an "ACTION ITEM" with NO PUBLIC COMMENT ALLOWED.

Ty: "A lawsuit over the sale has the potential to stretch discussions about selling the park property to the Uni-versity of Texas System into next year, with some vowing that the May 2 election will be a referendum on the sale even with the beginning of the election filing period still more than two months away."
MMB: Actually, Ty, the election will be held May 9, not May 2. According to City Attorney Mark Sossi, the City Commission merely agreed on a resolution to "enter into negotiations" with the University of Texas concerning a transfer of Lincoln Park. Sossi claims there is no actual sale agreement.

Ty: "In February 2013, the city agreed to sell land to the University of Texas at Brownsville for expansion as part of a deal to keep the school downtown when it was floating the idea of relocating."
MMB: The notion that the University of Texas would vacate over $100,000,000 worth of buildings paid for by Brownsville taxpayers is ludicrous. They were NEVER leaving, with or without the 48 acres of Lincoln Park.

Ty: "(In February 2013) No one voted against the deal, though District 2 Commissioner Jessica Tetreau abstained."
MMB: Totally wrong. There were two votes to "donate" property to UT in February 2013, one February 5, the other February 25. Here are the two action items considered February 5, 2013:

"ACTION on Resolution Number 2013-015, authorizing the donation of a 55.43-acre tract of land to the University of Texas System, designating signatories, and dealing with related
matters.
ACTION on Resolution Number 2013-016, authorizing the donation of a 21.5-acre tract of
land to the University of Texas system, designating signatories, and dealing with related matters."
Ayes: Mayor Martinez, Commissioners Vasquez, Zamora, Gowen, Longoria, and Villarreal.
Nays: None
Abstained: Commissioner Tetreau

MMB: Neither one of these Action Items concerned Lincoln Park. According to Tony Martinez, UT considered the two tracts above, came back and suggested the 48 acre Lincoln Park be offered instead.
This change necessitated a "clarification" in an Action Item presented February 25, 2013:
2. Consideration and ACTION on Resolution Number 2013-022, clarifying property to be donated to the University of Texas system if a downtown location is selected for a campus.
MMB: Assistant Attorney John Chosy presented this item, stating that Lincoln Park would be substituted for the two tracts mentioned February 5, 2013. Here is the voting for the clarified Agenda Item presented February 25, 2013:
Ayes: Mayor Martinez, Commissioners Gowen, Longoria, and Villarreal;
Nay: Commissioner Zamora. 

Commissioner Tetreau and Vasquez were absent.

Ty: "When it came time to transfer the land, Brownsville spokeswoman Patty Gonzalez marketed a required public hearing ahead of the sale as an opportunity for residents to discuss their plans for a replacement park, which would be located across the expressway and built with the proceeds of the sale."
MMB: Again, totally incorrect. The hearing, by law, HAD to be about WHETHER OR NOT sell the park, not about the amenities of the new park. The City of Brownsville, through their newly hired Public Relations Officer, Patty Gonzalez, DID try to spin the purpose of the meeting as Ty suggests, but, after being called out in the city's blogs, the official public notice reflected the legal purpose of the meeting, not what Patty had told The Herald.

Ty: "City leaders and supporters insisted the $6.5 million could easily replace amenities at the current park, itself a replacement for the original Lincoln Park, which was closed in 2001 when the Texas Department of Transportation built the expressway, but opponents seized on the proposed location of the new park, which is across East University Boulevard from a water treatment plant."
MMB: Actually, at the November 4, 2014 City Commission Meeting, City Manager Charlie Cabler said assessment of the cost of utilities and replacement of amenities on the proposed new park site had not been completed, but that the numbers looked "close." 

Not very reassuring!