Robert Wightman, Friday, May 29
"The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit. Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it."
The Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyam"The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit. Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it."
By Juan Montoya
And so – with great reluctance and trepidation – I will engage Robert Wightman, a known cyberbuffon, and will attempt to establish the link between the failed grievance he helped his nephew file against local attorney Louis Sorola with the Texas State Bar and his Rotundness.
Wightman is one of those malingering malcontents who throws the proverbial verbal stone and hides behind the cyberwall of his megaphone from where he proclaims "It is me, the giant" and – when he falls flat on his face – denies he ever said anything.
I was able to talk our blog's accountant into hiring renown handwriting expert E. Scribe Feo to examine the handwriting on the state bar complaint he helped his nephew Emilio Montes file against Sorola and compare it to a document filled out by Wightman some time back.
The State Bar complaint (left) is number 201502393 - Emilio Montes - Louis Sorola and was sent April 20, 2015. The other document (right) is an application Wightman filed with the United States District Court of Columbia (DC) March 22, 2008 to proceed In Forma Pauperis without prepayment of fees and affidavit. Wightman was able to claim penury so he could have petition the U.S. Dept.of Education forgive his student loans ($40,000+) claiming he was a disabled veteran.
(Actually, Wightman was in the peacetime U.S. Army from 1981 to March 31, 1983, just a little over a year and a half and was discharged for a psychiatric disorder. Apparently, that's the basis for his claim for a "service-connected" disability for which he also claims a property tax discount on his $109,000 home. He also suffered from ulcerative colitis and depression as a result of his gay lifestyle.)
But we digress. Handwriting, yeah that's the ticket.
Experts like Mr. Feo say that "handwriting comparison requires the meticulous comparison of each and every character and can only be carried out in a like for like fashion (e.g. comparing block capitals with block capitals, numerals with numerals etc.).
Additionally, "it is important to obtain the original documents for examination where these are available."
Ditto for that. So let's get to it. Did Wightman – based on comparison of handwriting on both of these original documents – participate in the State Bar grievance his nephew filed?
The "B" at left is from the state bar complaint. The "B" at right is from Wightman's 2008 application to have the taxpayers pay for his student loans. Notice the small "r"s are also identical.
Not convinced?
Let's try another block letter, as the experts suggest. Mr. E. Scribe Feo saw another index letter in the way Wightman writes his "D"s.
On the left, a "D" from the state bar complaint. On the right, a "D" from his application for loans forgiveness.
Well, we could go on and on, but we tire of this foolishness, just as you, dear reader, must be tired of this as well.
Sorola is not the only successful attorney that Wightman (who by the way, was disbarred back in Jan. 11, 2002) has bedeviled. He is in good company. He has – at one time or another – gone after Alex Begum, Luis Saenz, Ed Cyganiewicz, Alex Dominguez, Ben Neece, David Gonzalez, Rick Zayas, Arturo Nelson, Art McDonald, Jim Hunter, Art McDonald, Andrew Hanen, etc., and called upon the them the wrath of the FBI, the Dept. of Justice (sending their files to the DOJ is his favorite threat), and the Almighty Himself (Yeshua, with whom he claims he is still is in good terms and has not sued...yet).
In fact, in one of his lawsuits he told a DC federal court that he was the victim of a conspiracy extending from the Texas Supreme Court, the FBI, George W. Bush, the FBI director, the U.S. Attorney General, Barack Obama, because he received an offer for a credit card in the mail.
Given this pedigree, it ain't too far-fetched to think that Wightman was behind the State Bar grievance filed under his nephew's name.
Anyway, that's the conclusion reached by E. Scribe Feo. What do you think?
The "B" at left is from the state bar complaint. The "B" at right is from Wightman's 2008 application to have the taxpayers pay for his student loans. Notice the small "r"s are also identical.
Not convinced?
Let's try another block letter, as the experts suggest. Mr. E. Scribe Feo saw another index letter in the way Wightman writes his "D"s.
On the left, a "D" from the state bar complaint. On the right, a "D" from his application for loans forgiveness.
Well, we could go on and on, but we tire of this foolishness, just as you, dear reader, must be tired of this as well.
Sorola is not the only successful attorney that Wightman (who by the way, was disbarred back in Jan. 11, 2002) has bedeviled. He is in good company. He has – at one time or another – gone after Alex Begum, Luis Saenz, Ed Cyganiewicz, Alex Dominguez, Ben Neece, David Gonzalez, Rick Zayas, Arturo Nelson, Art McDonald, Jim Hunter, Art McDonald, Andrew Hanen, etc., and called upon the them the wrath of the FBI, the Dept. of Justice (sending their files to the DOJ is his favorite threat), and the Almighty Himself (Yeshua, with whom he claims he is still is in good terms and has not sued...yet).
In fact, in one of his lawsuits he told a DC federal court that he was the victim of a conspiracy extending from the Texas Supreme Court, the FBI, George W. Bush, the FBI director, the U.S. Attorney General, Barack Obama, because he received an offer for a credit card in the mail.
Given this pedigree, it ain't too far-fetched to think that Wightman was behind the State Bar grievance filed under his nephew's name.
Anyway, that's the conclusion reached by E. Scribe Feo. What do you think?
1 comment:
Juan, why do you insist on playing this fool's game? Anyone can see his B and D are different. The B is completely different. So, instead of moving on you play his silly little game and end up looking stupid. His B is clearly closed. The B on the complaint is not closed. The D on the complaint has a tail. Wightman's D does not. Wightman's D does not cross the straight line. In the complaint it does.
Just saying, stop playing into his games.
Post a Comment