Friday, June 12, 2015

READING BEYOND CARL CHILTON'S STILLMAN FABLE


By Juan Montoya

At the time that the Brownsville Independent School District board of trustees decided to name a new elementary school after Brownsville "founder" Charles Stillman, Eliceo Muñoz cast the only dissenting vote.
You see, Cheo had a personal beef with naming the school after the Connecticut Yankee who came to South Texas and cleaned up on land and riches at the expense of the local yokels.
One of his ancestors – one Miguel Salinas – was the real owner of the tract of land where Ft. Brown and the original town site was located. This Salinas had purchased the land from the original owners (Doña Josefa Cavazos) and had a legitimate title, which Stillman did not. In fact. Salinas was the original operator of the ferry service which Stillman coveted and – with the help of the military and the newly-arrived U.S. authorities – stole from Salinas.
Cheo, like those of us who read local fairy tale writer Carl Chilton, probably can't believe the fabrications and contortions of logic that this coffee-table writer has made up to glorify this filibuster.
A Wikipedia article written by John Mason Hart states that even before the Mexican-American War, the United States Government was looking to build a permanent Fort along the Rio Grande River. Charles Stillman having acquired questionable deeds from squatters on the land offered to lease it to the Government to build a fort. This land was part of the Espiritu Santo Land Grant but due to a complication involving the owners not listing the land with the Mexican or Texas Government, a land dispute ensued which reached the U.S. Supreme Court.
To make a long story short, the original title held by Josefa Cavazos – and the heirs of Miguel Salinas – were upheld numerous times by the State of Texas and U.S. courts, but legal maneuvering by Stillman's representatives ended up with the U.S. government paying Stillman $160,000 for the land with which he was to share with at least 12 to 15 other claimants.
To his credit, Stillman not only stiffed his own attorneys, he also cheated the Cavazos and Salinas heirs out of their share. He was the original equal-opportunity offender.
Try as you might, you won't find that out if you read Chilton's fable. Hart's article is much more revealing and goes thus:
"In the aftermath of the Mexican defeat Stillman purchased massive properties of the Garza grant north and northwest of Matamoros from the children of the first wife of José Narciso Cavazos. The sellers, however, had no legal right to make such a sale, since their father had remarried and the heirs of his second wife, led by the eldest son, Juan N. Cortina, inherited the land from their father upon his death. The excluded children of the first wife 'sold' not only the family estates but also the ejido or community property of Matamoros, which was inalienable under Spanish and Mexican law. Nevertheless, Stillman started a town company to sell lots for as much as $1,500 each and named the place Brownsville."
The land which was less than a mile from the Fort was also disputed. Stillman offered the Cavazos family $33,000 for their land even though it was worth $214,000. The Cavazos family accepted the offer to avoid paying legal fees. However, Stillman never paid the Cavazos family the $33,000 for the land (Takaki, 1993). Since the land belonged to the heirs of his second marriage, this was one of the reasons the "Cortinas Wars" happened.
Shortly before the Civil War Stillman hired a clerk by the name of Francisco Yturria who would become an instrumental partner to Richard King, Mifflin Kenedy and Co. during the Civil War. Yturria, being born in Matamoros, could register boats under Mexico allowing them to fly the Mexican flag. Since Mexico was a neutral country American ships blockading the Texas Coast for contraband meant for the Confederate cause could not board Stillman's ships.
Yturria also worked with Stillman, King, and Kenedy to dispossess countless Mexican-Americans of their land. For that, he was duly rewarded by the trio. That was the origin of the Yturria Ranch.
Stillman, King and Kenedy arranged for bales of cotton to be sent to Brownsville where it was ferried across the Rio Grande to Matamoros. It should be noted that the Rio Grande could not be blockaded as it was an international border and would have caused an incident with the Mexican Government. Despite Union Forces capturing Brownsville in 1863 and 1864 smuggling cotton was still a profitable venture."
Let's leave old "Don Carlos" there. He was a thief, a smuggler, and a turncoat who made a fortune stealing people's land and selling to both sides during the Civil War which meant profiting from the death of young Union and Confederate soldiers.
Between 1862 and 1865 Stillman, King, and Kenedy transported Confederate cotton to Matamoros under contract for payment in gold. Stillman bought much of the cotton and sent it to his textile complex at Monterrey, but he sold even more of it in New York through his mercantile firm, Smith and Dunning.
The United States government was a major purchaser. His cotton buyers in Texas included George W. Brackenridge, and one of his major suppliers was Thomas William House.
By the end of the war Stillman was one of the richest men in America. He concentrated his investments in the National City Bank of New York, which his son James later controlled, and supplied Brackenridge with $200,000 in the 1870s in order to establish the San Antonio National Bank.
And an added footnote here: The land for Annie S. Putegnat Elementary and Washington Park were not "donated" to the people of Brownsville by Charles. They were instead "legally released" by his attorneys. In other words, they were not his to "donate."
Now the City of Brownsville has spent tens of thousands of dollars to renovate Charles' love shack from the Laureles Ranch section of the King Ranch. Even in death, Stillman is profiting from the local rubes.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

What's the real story on BISD insurance changes?

KBRO said...

And the lesson to this fable is "Do not buy land from spurious 'owners'" which will land you in court for more years than you have to live and will cost much more then tens of thousands of dollars to correct whereas it costs much, much more to have this historic building to interpret ranching history in south Texas. Your readers may hate what I write but I love Brownsville for what it is today and what it can be tomorrow. What has all your complaining about Charles Stillman accomplished other than to misinform and create hatred where none needs to exist?

Anonymous said...

Our fascinating history.


Curious how one leading Mexican, highly intellectual historian, as Mexicano as they get, wrote that Charles Stillman is greatly misunderstood. That he was the only one who came to live in Matamoros back when it was a poverty filled, broke ass, disease plagued, jacale filled, hell hole in the 1820's. He invested big bucks bringing his father's ships here, built warehouses, and invested in Mexican merchandise for export. He goes on to write that Stillman was the true father of international commerce of Matamoros, and the man who made it into an important cosmopolitan city and center of international trade that it became by 1836.


Just too curious right ? The diversity of opinions about our confusing history.


Zorro



Anonymous said...

La verdad no peca pero incomoda verda stillman?

Anonymous said...

Are BISD trustees self serving a--holes? Otis, Joe Minerva, Carlos, Cesar,,,,???

Anonymous said...

Actually , Juan is doing a very good thing by informing his readers about the real history of this area . ...your post is just an attempt to distract as is your style .

Anonymous said...

This story reminds me, when I arrived in Brownsville at the age of 10, we rented a home on Lincoln street. Across from our home lived a family with the last name Balli. I remember my parents having a table conversation talking about how our neighbors from across the street were involved in a lawsuit dealing with the rightful ownership of South Padre Island. These people were descendants of father Nicolas Balli. This was 44 years ago and for what I've read on the subject, the legal "fight" still continues.

Anonymous said...

The transport and restoration of the Laureles Ranch House was paid for entirely by Alexander Stillman and cost the taxpayers not one Centavo.

Anonymous said...

BISD has a history of naming schools for living people who prove to be scoundrels before they die. We have a school named for Julieta Garcia, a scoundrel who has misused and mismanaged tax dollars for years as the Queen of UTB.....which has faded, along with Queen Juliets glory.....a glory sponsored and supported by the Kardenas Klan, possibly some of the city's worst scoundrels.

Anonymous said...

Stillman was a capitalist and he did what capitalist do. He acquired wealth and he seems to have been pretty good at it. That it seems he was ethically challenged in some of his dealings, apparently in other cases by helping himself he also helped the economy of Matamoros. That seems to happen sometimes. In fact, I believe there are a number of capitalist theories that espouse this very thing. I guess it is unlikely that he would have set out to benefit Mata if there was nothing in it for him but that doesn't take away from the possibility that he did benefit the Mexican community sometimes (or maybe just once) Denying the truth doesn't make it untrue.

Anonymous said...

Is this the Estilman chack Da Mayor paid 2.3 million bucks to have it placed in front of the Fed bldg ? Congrats to Tony, the Herb, for his business acumen .

Anonymous said...

I sure would like to know who that historian that wrote so highly of Stillman was. Where did he get his facts? Oh, yes it is alright to write lies only when it covers truths that are pleasing to your ears. What has happened is that lies are taken as facts when they are published by irrisponsible media. After a while people start believing them as truths. Thanks Juan for keeping this alive, just like the jews keep on riminding us about the Holocaust. Well, this was one of our Holocausts since we were suppressed, and killed by the Texas Rangers. I have lived all my life in Brownsville and I have never cared to visit Stillman's alter or home and never will.

Anonymous said...

Bullshit! Then what was all those 35 grand and under money grabs Tony Martinez did for the ranch house? That's when everyone found out he was going around the dumb-ass city commission . Of course the taxpayers paid!


Anonymous said...

What is wrong with our society? I didn’t know that all capitalists were thieves. Yes, capitalists that steal millions of dollars in Wall Street are all ethically challenged so they should not be called thieves. Aren’t those that steal a case of beer from a 7 -11 also ethically challenged and should not be prosecuted? Stillman came to Matamoros since he saw this place as the easiest place where the Mexican community could be easily exploited. Matamoros did not thrive because of him. Matamoros thrived despite his thievery. Most of us knew Yolanda Gonzalez. She was our best Brownsville historian. She was also related to the Salinas and she did a lot of research into all the properties that were stolen from the Salinas family. When Yolanda passed away she left all her research papers to her relatives. Gene Fernandez approached the family members which decided to make her research available to our community. It so happens that he had to exclude all her research that had to do with these properties that were stolen from her family since it could raise some anger among the Stillman supporters and not our Brownsville residents who want to know the truth. Juan continue your good work.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like anti-capitalists trying to interpret history as suits their ends. If you want to know who wrote that history of matamoros, i suggest you learn Spanish, an do some real research.

Anonymous said...

This Salinas had purchased the land from the original owners (Doña Josefa Cavazos) and had a legitimate title, which Stillman did not.

The Cavazos stole the land from the local indigenous natives as well, why does land ownership always only start with the Mexican land owners.

The local yokels stole the land from the Indians and on and on it goes.

Anonymous said...

Are you familiar with the term "tongue in check"? Of course he was a thief and exploited people. Besides, who said an "ethically challenged" person couldn't be a thieve? And while not all capitalist are thieves most thieves are capitalist. My point was that even when something is done for the wrong reasons sometimes there are unintended consequences that are positive and that too is part of our history.

rita