By Manuel Callahan
"Mexican Border Troubles: Social War, Settler Colonialism and
the Production of Frontier Discourses, 1848-1880"
Callahan, B.A, M.A.
Dissertation, 2003,
The University of Texas, Austin
"Anglo violence continued long after the US-Mexico War had ended. An
example of Anglo impunity took place in January of 1850 when Charles Stillman
15 and associates rode into the Palmito Ranch. Stillman had been robbed earlier and
he and his men were determined to recover his stolen property and punish the
culprits.
Stillman “got together a force of Americans” from Brownsville and
rounded up the entire population of the ranch, ordering them tied and whipped
until they delivered the malefactors. Stillman’s interrogation revealed that the
guilty party was Juan Chapa Guerra and that he was at Ranchito.
Once Stillman’s
men found the man they believed to be responsible for the theft, he informed them
that they could “do what they pleased with him.”
It was not until after Chapa had been “whipped and then killed” at the
hands of Stillman’s associates that an investigation not only “disclosed the
horrible proceedings of the murder” but also uncovered that Stillman and his men
had incorrectly identified the accused victim.
The confusion resulted from a lethal
cultural barrier. The one guilty of the original theft was allegedly one Juan Chapa
Garcia, not Juan Chapa Guerra.
The outraged family of the wronged Juan Chapa
Guerra sought legal remedy, but they could find no lawyers in Brownsville
willing to challenge Stillman.
Much later, the 1873 Mexican Committee of Investigation concluded that
as a notable person of considerable resources Stillman “exercised a controlling
influence in Brownsville,” explaining, in part, why such a grave miscarriage of justice remained unpunished.
Stillman could boast of a great deal of influence in
Brownsville as a result of a number of successful commercial ventures in the
region.
During the US-Mexican War Stillman supplied General Zachary Taylor’s
army with goods delivered from the Gulf of Mexico up the Rio Grande.
Following the war, Stillman continued to profit. His success was due, to some
extent, on the purchase of large tracts of disputed lands made available to him by
Sabas Cavazos.
In Texas courts, Anglos such as Stillman were able to take
advantage of the diminished legal standing of the Spanish and Mexican legal
apparatus adjudicating communally held lands.
Stillman, for example, profited
handsomely by establishing the Brownsville Town Company with the land he so
easily acquired with Cavazos aid.
After converting the property into lots, he easily
disposed of most the tracts for a considerable profit. As a result of his early
successes, Stillman developed “a trade and manufacturing nexus” throughout
Northeastern Mexico and South Texas, dominating “large scale trade, finance,
and landholding in the Rio Grande Valley.”
At one point, Stillman and associate
Richard King hoped to further solidify their investments and holdings by
supporting Jose Maria Carvajal’s unsuccessful attempt to establish the Republic
of the Sierra Madre.
Later, as Mexican liberals struggled to rid
themselves of the occupying French forces through a widespread guerrilla war, John Hart adds that Stillman and other prominent Anglos such as Richard
King established their commercial empires through their effective use of
paramilitary force.
“From the 1850s to the mid 1870s,” John Hart explains, “their
controversial claims to these properties were backed up by the Texas Rangers, the
U.S. Army, and their own private armies.
For years their militias fought the
Mexicans who confiscated cattle and burned ranches in retaliation for their
displacement. The titles were still in dispute in Texas courtrooms at the end of the
twentieth century.”
Monday, April 11, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
This town is 93 percent Hispanic. Why do we still put up with honoring this piece of shit? It is because all of our politicians are thieves and they recognize one of their own.
More Chicano La Raza spin on history. This far left wing idiot teaches Chicano Studies at Univ. of California Santa Barbra. This fact pretty well tells you who is is and his slated view of history.
Charles Stillman was an opportunists that played by no rule and no code of honor, other than grabbing all he could, while he could. No reading of history would deliver another view of the man.
What is unfair it to bash the man because he was a Gringo opportunists, when such opportunism is spread throughout all cultures and languages groups. Stillman was a prick not because he was a Gringo, but because he was a prick.
I find it more than unfair, but downright racist to suggest that Stillman was a bigger prick than Cortina. They were both pricks, one Anglo and the other Mexican. To paraphrase Gertrude Stein; "A prick, is a prick, is a prick.".
Which naturally leads to today's Brownsville leadership, which is a bunch of opportunistic Mexican pricks. Stillman would not like living in Brownsville today as he would have too much competition, in screwing the population out of what little they have.
Bravo at 12:45!
I feel as if I was robbed of IQ points
yeah.. a Prick is Prick.. Ricardo Longoria. your city commissioner
Pinche haterz. If you all lived back then when there was no law and could literally get away with murder i'm sure we all would have went out and gotten our hands on as much possible.
Post a Comment