From "East of Eden" by John Steinbeck
By Juan Montoya
George Washington never made it to Brownsville.
For that matter, neither did Abraham Lincoln.
And while it's true that we have no cherry trees that young George could have cut down along the Rio Grande, the events that happened along its banks 170 years ago last May made a definite impact on the budding political career of Lincoln and his subsequent nightmare to keep the Union intact.
And two future presidents, Zachary Taylor and Ulysses S. Grant fought the Mexican Army on the grassy lowlands just north of FM 511 where the Palo Alto National Battlefield center stands today.
The closest Robert E. Lee - the general of the Confederacy - got to Brownsville was on a ship off Brazos Island awaiting the arrival of forces campaigning with Taylor in northern Mexico to invade Veracruz and marchfrom there to force the capitulation of Mexico City with Gen. Winfield Scott.
Lee later returned to Brownsville prior to the Civil War as a Union officer to assist with the "bandit" wars against Juan Nepomuceno Cortina
As Steinbeck correctly concludes, the U.S. soldiers who fought here and who were stationed on the fort that Taylor built on the banks of the Rio Grande went on to lead the ranks of the northern and southern armies in the Civil War that was to come less that two decades later.
No less than 37 future generals fought the Mexican army at Palo Alto (23 Union and 14 Confederate).
Another 15 future generals (six Union, nine Confederate) were present during the siege of Ft. Brown across from Matamoros, next to the golf course at the college.
It can be safely said that the seeds of the Civil War were planted at Palo Alto and at Resaca de la Guerra the next day, although the field was watered with U.S. and Mexican blood and not exclusively American as it was during the Civil War.
Although Lincoln, never set foot on South Texas soil, the events that unfolded here linked his life inextricably to our area.
Lincoln’s biographers say that the first utterances Lincoln gave concerning South Texas came some three weeks after Mexican and U.S. forces clashed May 7, 1846, at Palo Alto and ignited the war that ended with more than half of Mexico in possession of the United States.
At that time he is said to have been given a “warm, thrilling, and effective” speech at a public meeting that he gave to encourage volunteering. However, he was of like mind with most young white males of the day in that he considered most Mexicans ”greasers,” according to historian Mark E. Neely in a paper he presented in 1981.
When he got to Washington as a newly-elected congressman in 1847, he thought that whether one agreed with President James K. Polk on the Mexican War, “should...as good citizens and patriots, remain silent...at least till the war should be ended.”
But all that changed when Lincoln, the Whig congressman, arrived in Congress. By that time the fighting was substantially over. In his annual message of December, 1847, Polk asked Congress for additional funds to bring the war to a close, claiming the vast territories of New Mexico and California as partial indemnity. In that address, he repeated the claim that Mexico had initiated the war by “invading the territory of the State of Texas, striking the first blow, and shedding the blood of our citizens on our own soil.”
Shortly thereafter, on December 22, Lincoln introduced a series of resolutions requiring that Polk provide the House with “all the facts which go to establish whether the particular spot of soil on which the blood of our citizens was so shed, was, or was not, our own soil.”
Had that spot, Lincoln queried, ever been a part of Texas and whether its inhabitants had ever submitted themselves to the government or laws of Texas...by consent, or by compulsion, either by accepting office, or voting at elections, or paying taxes, or serving on juries, or...in any other way?”
Lincoln even joined 85 other Whigs led by Massachusetts representative George Ashmun who introduced a resolution declaring that the war had been “unnecessarily and unconstitutionally began by the President of the United States.”
Lincoln’s anti-Polk tirades in the House eventually earned him the wrath of the Democratic press, who chided the new congressman by calling him “Spotty” Lincoln, in reference to his insistence that Polk name the spot where hostilities had begun. His two predecessors in the congressional district – John H. Hardin and E. D. Baker – both had served volunteered to serve in the Army when the war broke out.
This apparent contradiction didn’t go unnoticed by Missouri representative John Jameson, of Missouri, who professed astonishment that the successor of Hardin – killed at Buena Vista – and Baker, a hero of the battle Cerro Gordo, should utter such unpatriotic speeches.
The reaction in the press was partisan as it was pointed. Precious few Whigs came to Lincoln’s defense, but pro-Democratic newspapers took umbrage with his views in no uncertain terms. The Illinois State Register warned that Lincoln predicted that he would have “a fearful account to settle” with the veterans when they returned from Mexico.
Likewise, the Peoria Press denounced Lincoln as the “Miserable man of spots” and pilloried him for his “traitorous course in Congress.”
In public meetings, Democratic speakers chastised Lincoln for “base, dastardly, and treasonable assault upon President Polk” and prophesied that “henceforth will this Benedict Arnold of our district be known here only as the Spotty Ranchero of one term.”
Lincoln only served one term, in large part for as a result of his stand on the Mexican War and his attack on Polk. But before he left office, he became the driving force who pushed for Taylor – victorious at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Guerra – to be drafted as the Whig candidate for president.
“Our only chance is with Taylor,” he cautioned voters on the presidential campaign trail.
After he left office, Lincoln could not have known that the men who had served with Taylor in Texas and Northern Mexico would play large roles in his future and that Taylor and later Grant would go on to become presidents themselves.
Grant would become Lincoln’s leading general, providing the Union with victories when things looked darkest. Besides Grant, other future Union generals who would later served under Lincoln that were present at Palo Alto included Gen. Benjamin Alford, Gen. Christopher Augur, Joseph K. Barnes, William Brooks, Robert Buchanan, and Don Carlos Buell, among others.
Future Confederate generals at the battle included Bernard Bee, Braxton Bragg, Samuel Gibbs French, Robert Selden Garnett, Bushrod Johnson, Edwin Kirby Smith, and James Longstreet.
Joseph K. Barnes, Taylor's medic, went on to become the U.S. Surgeon General and was serving in the position when Lincoln was shot at Ford’s Theater. He was one of the physicians who tended to the fatally wounded president before he died.
In fact, on April 14, 1865, Barnes attended the death bed of Lincoln and ministered to the successful restoration of Secretary of State William H. Seward. In 1881, during the long struggle of President James A. Garfield to live following his assassination, Barnes was one of the surgeons who for weeks served in the chamber of the dying president.
However, as it relates to Lincoln's ties to our area, while president, he and his cabinet grappled with the blockade of southern ports, including shipping from South Texas. Considerable fortunes (such as those of Charles Stillman and Robert King's) were made running the blockade to deliver cotton to British mills. As the Union tried to stem the flow of cotton from the South and arms from abroad, they found themselves helpless to stop the flow of Confederate cotton from Puerto Bagdad, on the Mexican side of the Rio Grande.
David Herbert Donald tells of the Peterhoff incident just off the coast of Brownsville in his Lincoln biography. Union forces captured the ship suspecting that it carried contraband intended for the Confederacy. Secretary of War Gideon Welles defended the Navy and urged Lincoln to open the mails so that proof of the ship’s intentions could be verified.
The British protested claiming the inviolability of the mails under international law and demanding that the Peterhoff be released.
Secretary of State William Seward backed the British position and things were at a stalemate until Lincoln interceded and laid the issue to rest. Telling his cabinet members that the US. could fight only “One war at a time,” he ordered the blockade-runner released.
Lincoln never visited South Texas, or Texas for that matter, but his presence looms large over this area. His contention that an unjust war and the inclusion of Texas as a slave state would further the divide that would lead to the Civil War was justified, and his relationship to those who fought here make him an important figure in this area’s history.
9 comments:
for that matter, you should write MEXICAN HISTORY. You're Mexican, Montoya!
Lincoln was a putz and Grant was a drunken butcher.
The history of this area is Mexican history as well as American history. This war was impacted by both nations and both cultures. Unfortunately local history teachers generally don't know local history and thus the students don't get a real history lesson...but one of accommodation. BISD continues to be a taxpayer day care facility and an academic center.
If you recall from your education classes, we were only taught the part of history that was of convenience to those teaching or those publishing the books. When were we even taught Brownsville History except for the Stillman family who was a large contributor, both negative and positive in manner. Our history lessons were current events, read the chapter, outline the chapter, answer the questions, draw a map, take a test and fail and still pass the course, cause if the teacher did not pass us, the principal would get after them. Our Brownsville history is very interesting and we should all take it upon ourselves to research and study it for our own self-satisfaction. And may I say, it also includes reading article like these written by Mr. Montoya. Google Bronbill Espress and you will find some very interesting stories about our city. If you don't contribute, don't
complain or put down those that do. Mexican or not - Hispanic or not.
OOPS! It is the Bronsbill Estacion! Not Bronsbill espress! But it does offer some interesting reading like the article above, but related to Brownsville. Look it up!
"and thus the students don't get a real history lesson."
..and thus we get brilliant and insightful comments such as the first two anonymous comments above.
Oh, so maybe the first two bloggers are teachers who do teach such history in their class because they, like most of us, realized that we were being cheated out of some great lessons. What I see now is that this type or education is not very prevalent in the current curricular, if it is not included in the STARRS test. There is no time to teach local history, cause it is not tested on the test. There is no time for discussion and sharing of knowledge in a relaxed atmosphere because every second in the classroom has to be direct to a specific skill - on the test - and if not, there is no time for that additional and fun facts. The classroom is now so technologically oriented and all we do is play with gadgets that don't even teach us how to do researches with various library sources - just google it! That is where the problem is. Yes, I will get a technological career that pay plenty of money, but I can not even tell you the topics of each Constitutional Amendment. Let's go back to the basics!
King's first name was not Robert, but Richard. Close but no seegar!
And his middle name was RATA
Post a Comment