Wednesday, June 26, 2019

CHAMBERS APPEAL SENT BACK TO 13TH COURT OF APPEALS

Special to El Rrun-Rrun

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has remanded the case of former Indian Lake Police chief John Chambers and ordered the 13th Court of Appeals to reconsider its finding that there was sufficient evidence to warrant his conviction of intent to defraud the government and whether the state presented enough evidence to overcome his statutory defense.

The court filed its opinion today.

 Chambers appealed his conviction in state court that he had defrauded the Texas Commission On Law Enforcement by ordering an underling to falsify the handgun certification of volunteer reserve police officers saying that the TCOLE did not require that he keep records of weapon certification because they were not employed by the  municipality.

Sine they were not government records required by law, he argued, he had not violated any laws.

"We...hold that the evidence was insufficient to support the intent-to-defraud-or-harm element and reverse the court of appeals’ determination that the evidence was sufficient," the majority decision reads. "However, we reverse and remand the case to the court of appeals to evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence to overcome (Chambers') statutory defense."

Chambers had argued that since the TCOLE did not require the certification to be kept and therefor he could not have committed a crime. However, the Court of Criminal Appeals found that "a record kept by the government for information is still a governmental record even if the government was not required to keep it.

"However, if the government has no legal authority to require the record, a person cannot defraud or harm the government by tampering with the record.

"Does this also mean that the falsification of the record in this case had no effect on the government’s purpose for requiring the record? That is unclear. We must remand the case to the court of appeals to consider that question because it was raised below but left unanswered."

However, a dissenter in the case stated that he agreed with his colleagues that "the evidence is insufficient to support the intent-to-defraud or-harm element.

"I also agree with the Court that the court of appeals failed to address the issue raised on appeal of whether the evidence was sufficient to overcome the statutory defense.

"I disagree, however, with remanding the case and would instead render a judgment of acquittal for Appellant because I find that the evidence is insufficient on the element of “governmental record.”

The case now goes back to the 13th Court of Appeals to follow the directives of the Criminal Court of Appeals.

The case against Chambers came as he was involved in a race for the Republican Party nomination for Cameron County Sheriff. He actually won the nomination, but his name was removed from the ballot.

Part of the investigation was carried out by members of the Cameron County District Attorney's Office Public Integrity Unit. It just so happened that one of his political opponents was Victor Cortez, was in charge of the PIU.

In fact, during Chambers' trial, Cortez took an active role in his prosecution, huddling in the corridors with Asst. DAs and new PIU honcho George Delaney, who replaced him. (See graphic at right.)

Despite the convictions a month before the party primary elections, Cameron County Republican voters gave Chambers 3,395 votes, Cortez 2,662, Robert Rodriguez, 2,365 and Michael Watkins 2,182.

His removal from the ballot resulted in Cortez facing Rodriguez, who finished behind Chambers by 1,030.

When Chamber was removed from the ballot, Cortez went on to be the Republican nominee for his party in the general election and lost to incumbent Omar Lucio.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Que paso con ELIZONDO?

Anonymous said...

McHale calling you 'little fella,' juan. Entrale a los chingasos, bro!

Anonymous said...

so is chambers planning to run for sheriff, is yes say so.

Anonymous said...

George is a dumb ass. He hates any man that has money or power. He goes into the offices of the females inspectors or para legal to tell them his life problems. He thinks ALL WOMEN LOVE MEN WITH A GUN. He tells them how he has taken down powerful men and he is involved in this case and that case. Any or all cases that are high profile George tells them he has been involved. He tells Young Women that even President Trump has reached out to him through mutual friends in the Federal Department to tell George to get intel on his enemies. George says women fall for it all the time. He is just an old pervert.

Anonymous said...

Juan simepre se le chivea a el jerry. Ya es tiempo que te pongas los pantalones, juanito! Avientate!

Anonymous said...

Nothing but a good old democrat party railroad ala sheriff omar lucio to get your opponents in trouble and off the ballot. lol

Anonymous said...

Run for sheriff John! We need to vite these old worthless politicians out of office. The good ol buddy system only servesca select few! I feel this is a time for big change in Cameron County!

Former DA Investigator said...

Chambers is hoping and has his fingers crossed that the Appellate Court will see his side of it? Huh, I don't remember you're attorney arguing about the lack of evidence that you are claiming in your appeal?

Anonymous said...

He proved he committed the crime but it didn’t matter.

Anonymous said...

Once again, DA Saenz charged a fellow with doing something that is not a crime. He did it with the Tax Collector Acessor and his employees and now he had done it with Chambers. The DAs is either incompetent or politicaly motivated. How long will the people keep electing these bozos to public office?

rita