Wednesday, July 24, 2019

TEXAS FACES AMERICA'S LOST HISTORY OF BORDER VIOLENCE

On June 18, 1916, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson ordered 110,000 National Guardsmen from state militias to the border for patrol duty. Above, troops in Brownsville, Texas.

By Rebecca Onion 
Slate

A hundred years ago, in the Texas counties along the U.S.-Mexico border, a decade-long flurry of extralegal killings perpetrated by Texas Rangers, local law enforcement, and civilian vigilantes took the lives of thousands of residents  of the United States who were of Mexican descent, and pushed many more across the border into Mexico.

This record of death and intimidation, which irrevocably shaped life in those border counties, has not been commonly taught in the state’s mainstream school curricula or otherwise recognized in official state histories. Mexican-American communities, however, have preserved the memory of the violence in family archives, songs, and stories.

“To many Mexicans, contemporary violence between Anglos and Mexicans can never be divorced from the bloody history of the Borderlands,”write William D. Carrigan and Clive Webb in their history of lynchings of Mexican-Americans. “They remember, even if the rest of the country does not.”

Belatedly, tentatively, Texas has begun to reckon with this bloody history. As election-year rhetoric around the border and Mexican immigration has reached new levels of xenophobia and raacism, the state - goaded by a group of historians calling themselves Refusing to Forget - has taken steps toward commemoration of the period called "La Matanza" (“The Killing”), with and exhibit at the Bob Bullock Texas State History Museum and three historical markers soon to be unveiled.

For a state that has long refused to come to terms with those years - sealing transcripts of a Congressional investigation into the killings and waxing nostalgic about the Texas Rangers despite their involvement - it’s something like progress, even if the legacy of this violence will require far more than exhibits to expiate.

The deaths that occurred between 1910 and 1920 are part of a longer history of lynching of Mexicans and Mexican-Americans in the United States - itself little-discussed in comparison with the parallel history of violence against black Americans. 

Carrigan and Webb identify waves of violence against mining camps Americans of Mexican descent in the 1850s (when Mexicans were forcibly expelled from many mining camps in California), the 1870s (when Mexicans and Americans both took to riading farms and ranches across their respective borders) , and the 1910s. While a mob’s stated reason for lynching black victims tended to be an accusation of sexual violence, for Mexicans in the United States, the reason given was often retaliation for murder or a crime against property: robbery, or what was sometimes called “banditry.”

Property - in the form of land - was the underlying cause of the Texas border violence that took place in the second decade of the 20th century. At the turn of the 20th century, an epic, often illegal, transfer of land began, moving ownership from Tejanos living in the border counties of Texas to newly arrived Anglo farmers and ranchers. 

(Because the people living through this history did not use the term “Mexican-American” to describe themselves, I’m following the lead of the Refusing to Forget historians, and using the terms “Texas-Mexicans” or “Tejanos” to describe Texas residents of Mexican descent.) The advent of the railroad, which reached the border city of Brownsville in 1904, made Anglo expansion onto historically Mexican land possible, seriously shifting the balance of power in the land along the Rio Grande.


This area had fallen within the borders of the United States since the middle of the 19th century, when the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American War and made the river the new boundary between the two countries. 

But it had remained culturally Mexican, with many Mexican residents staying on the ranches where they had been living - which were now, legally, located in Texas. Between the signing of the treaty and the advent of the railroad, the area was predominately Mexican, with a small number of Anglo settlers mixing into the culture, intermarrying with Tejano neighbors and learning to speak Spanish. 

As historian John Moran Gonzalez put it to me: “You paid your taxes in dollars, but you paid for your groceries in pesos. English was the language of government but everybody spoke Spanish.” The Border Patrol wasn’t founded until 1924; in the meantime, people went back and forth across the river easily.

(To read the entire post, click on link: 

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Slate is a joke, Juan! It panders to your kind

Anonymous said...

Another good article. Keep them coming!

Anonymous said...

Several republicans from that era were indicted and jailed they were catering to the so call land agents stealing land from the real land owners.

Anonymous said...

Manifest Destiny was the idea that whites were destined, by God, to govern the North American continent what a crock of bullshit and some idiots still believe it like the pig at the wh and the racist republicans

Anonymous said...

Stillman and Company were stealing land from the De La Garza family, that of which Juan N. Cortina was a member. Then they classified Cortina as a bandit when the Stillmans and his gabacho friends were the culprits, especially in stealing the land owned by Josefa Cavazos in the Fort Brown Area.

Anonymous said...

Puros gringos ratas y matones con los rinches nothing short.

Anonymous said...

More gringo hate. More race hate. More ignorant bullshit.

KBRO said...

Tell the De La Garzas clan and Cavasos offspring they are entitled to reparations from Stillman but not Kings or Kenedys who say fuk u eat ten dix

Anonymous said...

Go to the texas rangers archives in austin in one report one ranger to another said we must be in south texas I see a log of mexicans hanging from trees. Look it up this is not "More ignorant bullshit" as one idiot puts it...

Anonymous said...

Live here for ovr 75 years and have never seen a "log of Mexicans" hanging from trees. I guess I missed something interesting.

Anonymous said...

Mean Lots or many or muchos or beaucoup this is a blog estupido as long as you get your point across you need another 75 mas anos...

rita