Tuesday, June 8, 2021

DID OZZY OSBORNE ACTUALLY PEE ON THE ALAMO?


By Brian Burrough, Jason Stanford, and Chris Tomlinson
Vanity Fair

The story of the Alamo is simple, right? 

Davy Crockett, Jim Bowie, William Barret Travis, and a bunch of their friends come to Texas to start new lives, suddenly realize they are being oppressed by the Mexican dictator Santa Anna, and rush off to do battle with him at an old Spanish mission in San Antonio. 

They are outnumbered but fight valiantly and die, to a man, buying Sam Houston enough time to defeat Santa Anna at the Battle of San Jacinto. As almost any Texan will tell you, their sacrifice turned the Alamo into the cradle of Texas liberty.

The problem is that much of what you think you know about the Alamo is wrong. What you just read? That’s the Alamo myth. The actual story, well, it’s a lot more complicated.

These days there are essentially two schools of thought about the Alamo and what it means. A playful way to contrast them is through the stories of the two British rock stars most closely associated with all this. The first would be Phil Collins, who began his career drumming for the band Genesis and, as a solo singer, has sold millions of albums. 

Collins happens to be the world’s greatest collector of Alamo artifacts. He owns Sam Houston’s Bowie knife, a belt said to have been worn by Travis, and a shot pouch Crockett is said to have turned over to a Mexican soldier before dying. Not to mention Alamo-sourced cannonballs, maps, letters, muskets, powder flasks, bullets, swords, and even human teeth.

Like many aficionados of a certain age, Collins caught the Alamo bug as a boy watching Fess Parker’s Davy Crockett on the small screen and John Wayne’s on the big. He named his Jack Russell terrier Travis. 

He was once told that in a previous life, he’d been a courier dashing in and out of the old mission in the days before Santa Anna’s soldiers stormed it. Collins wants to believe. He has hundreds of old Alamo photos, many flecked with small balls of white light. He believes these are “orbs,” globs of paranormal energy.

In Texas, though, where he has donated his collection as the core of a grand new museum planned for San Antonio, Collins is a giant among men. He represents the apotheosis of Alamo “traditionalism,” which is to say, he is deeply invested in the sanctity of the shrine and its tales of heroism. He is the ultimate believer—although he’s taken a bit of fire lately. Collins and other collectors have recently been ensnared in a feud with archivists and activists who say that some of their accumulated memorabilia is of suspect origin or it is downright bogus.

On the other end of the Alamo spectrum is none other than Ozzy Osbourne. The former Black Sabbath frontman and reality TV star passed into Alamo lore on a Friday afternoon, February 19, 1982. At approximately 2:50 p.m., as San Antonio children were heading home from school, a 33-year-old old man wobbled unsteadily into Alamo Plaza. He was wearing a torn green evening gown and sneakers. In his hand he carried a bottle of Courvoisier.

Osbourne was having a rough day. He and his bandmates, scheduled to perform a set at the San Antonio Convention Center that night, were squabbling. His partner, Sharon, was carping again about his drinking, which typically began when he rose in the morning, as it had on this day. In an effort to confine his drunken idylls to their hotel suite, Sharon had taken to hiding his clothes, hence the gown, which was hers.

Later, Ozzy would be hazy as to where he was heading that day. What he remembered clearly, though, was an overwhelming need to relieve himself. Frustrated by his inability to locate a suitable loo, he decided to do as inebriated rock stars have done since the dawn of time. He sidled up to what appeared to be a little-used section of wall, parted his dress, and proceeded, with a great sigh, to do his business. Suddenly he heard a voice behind him:

“You disgust me.”

Ozzy turned, as one would, and said, “What?”

An older gent in a cowboy hat was staring at him. “You’re a disgrace, d’ya know that?” he said.

Ozzy attempted to explain about the gown.

“It ain’t the dress, you limey faggot piece of dirt,” the man said. “That wall you’re relieving yourself on is the Alamo.”

“The Aalawot?”

That Ozzy Osbourne peed on the Alamo became part of the Texas canon. It has inspired everything from exchanges in mainstream movies (see: the Steve Buscemi character in Airheads) to journalistic investigations (see: “A Brief History of Peeing on the Alamo,” Texas Monthly, 2014) to an art installation in which a life-sized wax statue of Osbourne urinates on a wall once onlookers trigger an adjacent motion sensor. 

Alas, as with so much about the Alamo, the story is not exactly true. Ozzy didn’t actually pee on the Alamo. He actually peed on the Cenotaph, a 60-foot-high monument beside it, on which the names of all those killed are listed. City fathers banned him from performing in San Antonio for years, until Ozzy apologized and donated $10,000 to charity.


Osbourne represents the flip side of Collins’s traditionalism, what people in Texas call Alamo “revisionism,” an intellectual school that, metaphorically, amounts to peeing on the Alamo legend. 

Revisionists tend to think the entire Texas Revolt was a bit more about protecting slavery from Mexico’s abolitionist government than it was about opposing Santa Anna’s supposed tyranny. In the oral traditions of the Mexican American community, in fact, mothers and fathers, for decades, have passed down their view that the Alamo was a symbol of Anglo oppression. 

Indeed, to scores of Tejanos interviewed by the authors, white racism toward the Latino “other” was hard-wired into to Alamo narrative. As San Antonio art historian Ruben Cordova puts it, “Davy Crockett’s [death], it’s sort of like a Chicano version of the Jewish Christ killers. If you’re looking at the Alamo as a kind of state religion, this is the original sin. We killed Davy Crockett.”

To read rest of story, click on link:

25 comments:

Anonymous said...


If you go to the national museum in Mexico City, the Mexican "victory" at the Alamo is the other side of the story. Go, Ozzie!




Anonymous said...

The alamu reminds me of the racist republican lies. Where juan guey in that stupid movie was attacked at the alamu with 10k mexican soldiers LIE, where the alamu was constantly and everyday attacked LIE, where boowe as attacked in his bed fighting LIE, where juan guey was attacked by thousands of mexican soldiers with bayonet on a stairway with his bitch bettyboo LIE, he was hidden in a storage shed with all his so call brave pendejos....
All we need now is that trumputo was there, another LIE!

Anonymous said...

So what if he did Montoya! El pinche half coco trans retard mutt is always peeing and shitting in the downtown alleys! Hahaha!

Anonymous said...



The Alamo would have been a different story had it had a back door...

Anonymous said...

Greetings from Cebu City, Philippines...πŸ€πŸ‘πŸ’ͺπŸ™πŸΌπŸ’–πŸ˜‹πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­

Anonymous said...

DIOS BENDIGA NUESTROS PAISES AMERICANOS CON FE CIEGA EN DIOS Y DEMOCRACIA!!!

Saludos de Reynosa, Mexico.

Anonymous said...

Que cultural tan fuerte tenemos.

Anonymous said...




Pinches mexicanos son tan buena gente; Yo les amo con todo mi ❤!!

Grüß aus Deutschland!



Anonymous said...

He squatted idiota!

Anonymous said...

I pissed on the grave of Reconstruction Governor E.J.Davis. I would piss on Osborne also. Oh yes, and I would piss on Montoya's grave also, if the line wasn't to long.

Anonymous said...

June 8, 2021 at 12:01 PM
Also pee on yur-mama guey

Anonymous said...

Study the letters from the men at the Alamo to their families. It was a land grab; just like the entire history of the American West was.

Anonymous said...


Juan, know who your enemies are -

Jim Barton approved this comment on his blog:

Anonymous June 7, 2021 at 1:23 PM
"Juan Montoya bitching at Ben Neece. Didn't Ben keep him out of jail after 3/4 DWIs? Fucking ingrate!"


Kick his big lard ass, Juan.



Anonymous said...

Personally I think these STUPIDOS commentators need a job and Listerine to wash out their filthy mouths. They have no clue as to what the issues are in regards to the article. They are no better than the druggy Ozzy Osbourne. He would probably pee on his wife and kids and think it was funny Its the respect for our forefathers and descendants who fought for their land that was granted to them by the king of Spain. Juan Cortina is and forever will be the Grandson of Salvador de la Graza. The Grantee to all of Brownsville, which was part of the Espiritu Santo Land granted in 1781. The land grants were private land not part of Mexico nor Texas. The 1848 treaty of Guadalupe of Hidago makes it very clear as to ownership of land grants. He had all the right to fight Charles Stillman, Texas rangers, judges, and the law enforcement at the time, because it was his land they were stealing. His land was part of the porcion that was granted to Salvador de la Graza, his great-grandfather. Respect is what the issue is for all our forefathers who stood up to this corruption.

Anonymous said...

Three migrants held against their will.
They ain't got no will they don't pay property taxes just like all the elected officials here PAY YOUR SHARE PINCHES MAMONES!

Anonymous said...

Pathetic revisionist propaganda aimed at destroying anything "White".
Mexico has never Won anything on it's own, Texas and the United States kicked Mexico's ass and then paid off Corrupt Mexican government officials for Texas and the Southwest.
Things remain the same today.
Mexican citizens need to realize that The United States is not their biggest problem, it's the perpetual corrupt political machine that has always ruled Mexico.
Get your own history right before you try to change U.S. history.
Lo siento mijo .
It is what it is

Anonymous said...

fought for their land is correct and we are here living on stolen lands taken by thieves and murderers. Murder has no expiration somebody arrest them

Anonymous said...

June 9, 2021 at 7:49 AM

Cover up is the only solution you gringos have just like the racist republicans trying to bring down the whit house. Let's see, complain about that one pinche guey. Oh it was just tourists visiting. Ignorant fools sientelo mas cuando te tengan empinado es lo que no es guey!

Anonymous said...

First time in history that Texas is being audited. "Audited", when something does not match or add up to the request. In 1767 Texas was not even a state yet. Yet these stolen land grants had owners and titles to these stolen lands. Spanish land grants had Spanish names not American names. Our history is the injustices that came about for stealing, murdering and fraud committed by the WHITE , as you yourself identified with. Maybe you need to go back and study History in general before you address TEXAS history.

Anonymous said...

Pinche trinkets storage space available at the downtown HEB store.

Anonymous said...

Anyone with any knowledge other anecdotal knows that the original Spanish land grants for what is now Texas were nothing more than a way for disgraced Spanish Aristocrats and criminals to be sent away instead of crowding jails in Spain. Much like Australia was for England.
Mexico has been going down hill after the French gave up on a populus that was to lazy to work hard and to timid to fight for anything.

Anonymous said...

June 9, 2021 at 8:58 PM

You mean pictures of your camotes depicting small narrative little lies like building towns and wagon train taking cattle to the north, working the fields, building roads, you mean those hearsays? Seems like you don't want to hear or read about the real history of this region idiota.

Anonymous said...

How long do we have to hear this stupid nonsense about land theft. One native group took it from another native group, many times. The Spanish took it from the natives and killed as many of them as they could. The Mexican took it from the Spanish and the Americans took it from the Mexicans. The Spanish and Mexicans sold land via grants to land they stole from the natives. In one form or another this is the history of all land on this earth. Why all these Mexicans get the red ass over land their ancestors never legally owned is beyond me. I guess the loosers have to bitch about something.

Arguing over who owns the land is like two fleas arguing about who owns the dog....Crocodile
Dundee.

Anonymous said...

Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna became President of Mexico in 1835 and summarily threw out the Constitution of Mexico claiming his people were too unenlightened for liberty and that despotism could be wise and virtuous. Pathetic that this train of thought still exists with the privaledged elite that still attempt to run Mexico.
Disontent spread throughout Mexico, including Coahuila y Tejas and Santa Anna feared the Americans in Texas would secede and ordered his military to disarm all of Texas whenever possible.

All of this just 6 years after Mexico aboloished Slavery.

It is not the U.S. that Mexicans should be worried about, it is the despot elites that contonue to enslave the poor and under priviledged that are still held in a de facto slavery.

Mexico has no moral high ground to stand on, it's people arw literally dieing to get out of.

Anonymous said...

June 11, 2021 at 7:01 AM

Sounds like trumputo

arw literally dieing to

rita