Thursday, January 15, 2026

TRUMP WOULD HAVE DEFENDED "DOMESTIC TERRORIST" GOOD IN IRAN

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Distractions. Ramp up ICE violence.
Threats against allies. Bombings and invasions of sovereign nations.
Covering up for the unlawful delay of the Epstein files release and the failed attempts to end the Ukrainian war. The tariff-battered economy and climbing unemployment are a reality for most. The fiasco that is the GOP must be replaced. The government stating that things are improving is straight out of 1984.

Anonymous said...

The protests in Iran are about human rights. The riots here are about stupidity.

Anonymous said...

This just shows the stupidity of the Tpublicans.

Anonymous said...

The Epstein files is old news. Time to move on. As for the economy it's neither good nor bad. Only the communist want to replace the GOP. We'll have to wait and see what the majority of the people want. Just more left wing propaganda coming from this woke journalism.

Anonymous said...

What is Tpublicans?

Anonymous said...

It’s ironic how Trump wants to intervene in Iran to help the protesters. But, in our country protesters are labeled domestic terrorists.

Juan Montoya Is A Cossack said...


The U.S. is losing its allies.

There is only one left - Epstein Island

Anonymous said...

More like a nuts sack. . .

kok said...

Just a matter of time before ICE starts lining up people and kids and shoots them in the head. They're doing God's work.

Anonymous said...


Calling it ironic oversimplifies two very different situations.

In Iran, protests occur under an authoritarian regime where dissent is criminalized and basic freedoms are restricted; U.S. criticism is aimed at those human-rights conditions, not at endorsing chaos.

In the United States, protests are broadly protected under the First Amendment, and the “domestic terrorist” label is applied to specific acts of violence or organized threats—not to peaceful protest itself.

Equating the two ignores the legal context, the level of repression, and the distinction between peaceful dissent and criminal activity.

rita