(Ed.'s Note: Few people would find art in such a mundane thing as band of Texas Rangers hanging a Mexican after he supposedly stole the company's bugle and woke them up foolishly blowing it while they slept. A reflection of the times, perhaps, but this is the kind of literature that would probably be banned in classrooms by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and his fellow anti-critical race theory legislators in Austin.
Yet, on April 21, 1875, the Dallas Daily Herald printed the poem in its front page called "Hanging the Chaparral, or the Midnight Bugler." written by someone with the pseudonym of Buckskin Sam. There is much mirth and bravado in the tale of a company of Rangers busy with one Mexican, a tree, and a noose. Then "a half dozen boys who like that sort of fun" pull on the rope.The simple plot revolves around a band of rangers looking for Mexicans and routing them from a camp, then catching one in the chaparral accused of stealing the company bugle after he foolishly blows it at night and wakes them up. It goes downhill from there on. They string him up, he refuses to tell them where Cortina is, and they ride on leaving the Mexican hanging " a warning to all Greasers." We thank author/researcher Dr. Marie-Theresa Hernández, a professor in the Languages department at University of Houston, for bringing it to our attention.)
"Remember the Alamo," this
The war-cry shrill and clear
Of our brave band of rangers fell
Upon the bandits' ears
As in the morning, damp and still
We dashed into their camp
And woke them from their slumbers by
The thunder of our tramp..."
Few were our numbers, many they,
But on our side was right;
We shot them down remorselessly
Nor spared them in the fight
They fled in terror – all who escaped
From our avenging hand
For quarter was not given then
Along the Rio Grande
(After the slaughter, they make camp and are awakened by a Mexican blowing the company's bugle and capture the man, allegedly one of Cortina's men. He refuses to give them information on Cortina and they hang him.)
"What's up my boys," says Donaldson
Is this some thievin' Mex
That stole a bugle from Ft. Brown
He'd better pass his cheeks,
Put out a half-dozen scout
And scour the chaparral
And if we take him prisoner,
We'll ticket him to (hell)
(They capture a Mexican in the chaparral and return him wounded, and he refuses to talk)
They're coming, here they are," says Cap
And got a sneaking cuss
Dog-gone your dirty picture, why
Did you make such a fuss
Why didn't you come up decently
And say yer wanted hanging?
Where's Cortina and his band?
Look here now, none your shamin'
But not a word the bugler spoke
He fiercely looked around
While from his arms and from his cheek
The blood slow trickled down
"Bring me a rope, we'll find his tongue
You bet your bottom dollar
Here, Toby, make a hangsman knot
And fit him to a collar..."
The rope was looped around his neck
Then, o'er the limb was run
And half a dozen of the boys
Who liked that sort of fun
Pulled steadily upon the hemp
And brought him up standing
Till he was black as any nig
On Mississippi landing
"Hold on," says Cap
I'll interview the cuss
He'll give us information
If not, we'll treat him worse.
Now, Greaser, this is your last chance
Too do a Christian deed
Where's Cortina, tell us quick
Or be hung up for seed."
From mortal fear and loss of blood
The bugler's legs they quiver
But knowing well he ne'er again
Will see his Grande river
He braced himself and gazed around
Like tiger cat at bay
Then yelled, "Viva la Cortina"
Which was his final say...
For e're he finished high he swung...
Then hastily we packed out traps
And take our morning meal
Fall into line, answer the roll
And southward silently steal
Leaving the rigid bugler there
Slow swaying 'neath the tree
A warning to all Greasers, who
May chance that way to be....
6 comments:
Democrats have already ensured that we have become a society steeped in hatred due to the left's indoctrination that has persisted for decades. There is not a single race on this planet that has remained untouched by some form of racism. Racism stems from the indoctrination of hatred and a deficiency in intelligence. The crucial term here is intelligence. Educators should focus on preparing our future leaders in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. However, you radicals wish to persist in teaching hatred. It is hardly surprising that our youth is ranked as the least intelligent demographic in our nation. Our population grapples with low self-esteem. We must begin dismantling the barriers that keep our society anchored in the past.
7:47. “Democrats” is always the first thing that you lead with. The POTUS is the Racist-in-Chief. He
won’t condemn White supremacy at Charlottesville. He doesn’t have a single Black person on his cabinet. His bigotry is documented from the early 70’s.
Posting the Obamas as monkeys on his website was reprehensible. Very few Republicans called him out. If you support him, you are as complicit as the rest of them.
The statement makes several sweeping claims that don’t hold up well under scrutiny.
First, blaming one political party for “a society steeped in hatred” oversimplifies a much more complicated reality. Political polarization, racial tension, and distrust have grown across many democracies worldwide, under governments led by both conservatives and liberals. Hatred and division are not exclusive to “the left” or “the right”; they emerge from economic anxiety, media ecosystems, social fragmentation, historical inequality, and political rhetoric from multiple sides.
Second, the argument contradicts itself. It says racism exists in every race and is rooted in “indoctrination of hatred,” but then singles out one ideological group as uniquely responsible for spreading hatred. If racism is a broad human problem, then reducing it to one party’s ideology ignores history and human behavior across cultures and eras.
Third, calling educators “radicals” who “teach hatred” misrepresents what most schools actually do. Teaching about slavery, segregation, colonialism, discrimination, or civil rights is not the same as promoting hatred. Understanding historical injustice is often intended to help students avoid repeating it. A society can teach STEM and still teach history, ethics, civics, and critical thinking. These goals are not mutually exclusive.
The claim about youth being “the least intelligent demographic” is also unsupported. Younger generations today generally have higher rates of high school completion, college attendance, technological literacy, and access to information than previous generations. Concerns about educational quality are legitimate, but broad insults toward young people are not evidence-based.
The statement also frames intelligence and empathy as opposites, when they are not. Strong education systems around the world tend to combine technical competence with social understanding, communication skills, and historical awareness. Successful scientists, engineers, and leaders still need the ability to work across cultures and understand societal problems.
Finally, the conclusion about “dismantling barriers” is reasonable — but the rhetoric leading up to it undermines that goal. If the aim is reducing division and helping society move forward, accusing millions of people of indoctrination and hatred usually deepens resentment rather than solving problems.
A more constructive argument would be:
racism is a human problem, not a partisan monopoly;
education should emphasize both STEM and civic literacy;
society benefits from critical thinking rather than ideological conformity;
reducing polarization requires accountability and self-reflection from all sides, not collective blame aimed at one group.
So, we shouldn't bring up injustices from the past because it's just going to divide us even more? Why would that happen, it makes no sense at all? So, we're just supposed to overlook America's Original Sin?
Can’t handle the truth eh?
You got me there with your explanation.
Post a Comment