Saturday, September 5, 2026

IN THE EVENT THAT YOU SEE YOURSELF LOSING THE MIDTERMS, RIG THE VOTE


By Amy Howe
SCOTUSblog

The Trump administration returned to the Supreme Court on Thursday afternoon, asking the justices to temporarily pause an order by a federal judge in Boston that blocks the government from implementing parts of a U.S. Postal Service rule on mail-in ballots. 

U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the court that the order by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani “partially nullifies the Postal Service’s efforts to address the risk that the federal mails will be used to perpetrate voter fraud – a particularly pernicious species of fraud that dilutes the votes of lawful voters, prevents election results from reflecting the will of the American people, and undermines ‘public confidence in the integrity of the electoral process.’”

Thursday’s filing was the second time in less than six weeks that the Trump administration came to the Supreme Court seeking to clear the way to implement restrictions on mail-in voting. 

In March, President Donald Trump signed an executive order  that directed federal agencies to take a series of steps on mail-in voting. The first provision instructs the Department of Homeland Security to create lists of the adult U.S. citizens in each state and to send those lists to states at least 60 days before a federal election. 

The second provision tells the U.S. attorney general to “prioritize the investigation and, as appropriate, the prosecution of State and local officials … who issue Federal ballots to individuals not eligible to vote in a Federal election.” 

And the third provision requires states to give the U.S. Postal Service a list of voters to whom the states intend to send mail ballots, and it prohibits the USPS from mailing ballots to voters who are not on the lists of “enrolled” voters that the USPS will create.

A group of 23 states, led by California, and the District of Columbia went to federal court in Massachusetts to challenge the government’s implementation of the order. They argued that the executive order conflicts with provisions in the Constitution that give states the power to determine voter eligibility and to set the “Times, Places, and Manner” of holding congressional elections.

To read the rest of Howe's excellent article, click on link: https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/09/trump-administration-asks-supreme-court-to-clear-the-way-for-it-to-implement-new-mail-in-voting-/

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Considering that the 2020 election was stolen.

Anonymous said...

What Party in Cameron County is going to cheat? What party in Texas is planning on obstructing, disenfranchising by closing polling locations, and voter caging?

-LOTSHOTS

Anonymous said...

9:12 Are you still slinging that crap? You are a buffoon. 60 court cases were thrown out due to lack of evidence. Some of the judges were Trump appointed. Abbott is doing Trump's bidding by gerrymandering,
eliminating polling places, restricting mail-in voting and considering placing "poll watchers" to ensure fair elections.

rita