By John Mason Hart
(John Mason Hart, University of Houston professor of history, is the author of "Empire and Revolution: The Americans in Mexico since the Civil War" and "Revolutionary Mexico: The Coming and Process of the Mexican Revolution."
John Hart's speech on Mexico's intertwined economic history with the United States was given as the luncheon address during the Houston Peace and Justice Center's conference, "Winners and Losers: the Impact of Globalization," April 24, 2004. We print an excerpt from the speech focusing on the role of financiers like the Stillmans who acquired their fortune in during the cotton smuggling in Brownsville during the Civil War.)
The first country they encountered in that westward expansion, (with a)
duly constituted government of the Third World, not counting Native
Americans, was Mexico.
And they began to pour into Mexico in the 1860s,
first with loans and mercantile arrangements, and then later with
infrastructure development, industrial investments, resource extraction,
and finally, American settlements.
But the entry into Mexico began
almost as a direct corollary to what was going on during the Civil War,
because the Mexicans were fighting their own war with the French. They
lacked resources, but they had the spirit to fight. In fact, back in the
Mexican-American War, it turns out that they had mounted a gigantic
civilian resistance against the American war machine that occupied
Mexico City under the command of Winfred Scott.
So badly did they punish
the Americans for their presence in Mexico City that Scott had to
deploy his entire forces to protect supplies between Veracruz and Mexico
City. The Congress found out that President Polk had lied about
Mexicans shooting Americans on American soil, so they cut the budget on
the war effort and the American government basically was forced to sign a
treaty that ceded back to Mexico about a third of the land they were
seeking.
That is, the boundary would have been from Mazatlan to Tampico,
but instead they accepted the Rio Grande River across the Mesilla
Valley to Southern California. And so, we see here the basic contours of
what we are going to find in the rest of the Third World.
Having supported the Mexicans against the French to the tune of about
$250,000,000, the American investors – the same people I might add,
Taylor, Morgan, Baker, the heads of the three major banks that were
emerging at this time in the middle of the Nineteenth Century – were
demanding payment from a bankrupt Mexico. President Benito Juarez was
unable to make those payments, and so they negotiated for a period of
ten years, during which the Mexicans began to concede infrastructure
control to the Americans in lieu of cash payments.
In other words, we'll
give you a concession for railroads because we can't give you the money
you want. And so they set up contracts that arranged for transfers of
real estate and yielding trade and railroad/telegraph concessions to
these leading American capitalists.
The trouble was that in 1876 the new
Mexican president, Sebastian Lerdo de Tejada, cancelled all of the
concessions saying, "betterest a desert between strength and weakness."
That decision by Lerdo led to the American financial elite support of a
Mexican general for the overthrow of the democratically elected
president of Mexico.
The general that carried that action out, General
Porfirio Diaz, having lost the election in Mexico to President Lerdo,
went to New York, where he met with the Stillmans and Taylors and, I'm
not sure who else, but I located him in the bank, and then he returned
from City Bank to New Orleans, where he met with leaders of the Whitney
Bank and the Morgan shipping lines, and then to Brownsville where he
stayed in Charles Stillman's house for six months, during the duration
of a guerilla war which overthrew the Mexican government.
(James Stillman was the heir of Charles Stillman and was born on June 9, 1850 to Charles and Elizabeth Pamela Goodrich in Brownsville, Texas. Charles Stillman had significant business interests which James
acquired in 1872. He expanded those to control of sixteen Texas banks
and a significant land holdings in the Rio Grande Valley, particularly Corpus Christi and Kerrville, Texas.
Along with William Averell Harriman, Jacob Henry Schiff and William Rockefeller he controlled the most important Texas railroads (including the Texas and Pacific Railway, the Southern Pacific Railroad, the International-Great Northern Railroad, the Union Pacific Southern Railway, the St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway and the Mexican National Railroad.) In 1876 Stillman supported Porfirio Diaz's overthrow of the government of Mexico by the Revolution of Tuxtepec. He was chairman of the board of directors of the National City Bank and retired in 1908.)
Diaz then
returned to Mexico as the incoming president, where he would rule the
country from 1876 - 1910 directly as president, and four years
indirectly through a subaltern.
During that time, Americans took over 100 percent of Mexico's
infrastructure. They acquired 70 percent of the country's coastlines and
frontiers. 28 percent of the nation's surface. That's 28 percent of
465,000,000 acres. 70 percent of all incorporated businesses.
All of the
copper.
And with their Anglo allies, all of the oil.
Internally, Mexico
was characterized, politically, with a military dictatorship. When you
look at the incorporated entities that I just mentioned, and the copper
and oil companies, they were characterized by segregated housing and
labor, and even forced labor and slavery.
Some of the companies involved
are familiar names, Phelps Dodge, International Harvester, Pennsylvania
Railroad, and so on.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Diaz's automobile used to be stored out at crop duster airport, not sure if it is still there. Read B. Traven's "La Rosa Blanca", it's in both Spanish or English, to get picture of how the Gringos controlled the cotton of Tamaulipas and the working conditions of the peones.
Mr. Hart is correct in his book. These critters Came to Brownsville . They stole millones from the locals. The Main cause of the Mexican Revolution was that only 3 % of the people owned every thing . This happened with U.S. Asistance. The reason for Zapata et al
Being the precursors to the Revolution. ¿A dónde vas Juan.? Me voy a la bola.
Since Stillman and his crooks controlled the Courthouse government his cronies simply fixed legal records to their whims. Their actions to their double-dealing during the U.S. civil war was really tantamount to Treason .when the Tide turned to favor the U.S. they now turned Patriots like today's nutty T-Party.
The Thruth will come out...about the Stillman Khan.
Just another Marxist academic pandering to La Raza types and spouting bullshit. It has great appeal to numbers of people down here who never did anything with their lives and want somebody to blame. They certainly are not going to take blame for their own ignorance, lack of education and sloth. They have nothing of worth, because they did nothing of worth to earn anything of value.
Being a Mexican academic Marxist, my favorite Motto is: Que bonito es hacer Nada y despúes descansar! This is the motto of the Drinking Class.
when was the last time anonymous worked in construction i did for the past ten years though i have a bachelors degree etc etc but it was a real world education bigtime. stop the corpofacist lies. :)
Post a Comment