For the Republicans up north spending billion on a border wall to try to stanch the flow of undocumented immigrants may seem like a sane solution.

In spite of the costly wall, in April, the Border Patrol reported that in the Rio Grande Valley sector, formerly known as the McAllen sector, the apprehension total exploded from 97,762 in 2012 to 154,453 in 2013, the highest figure since 1999.
Since October, agents have apprehended more than 100,000 undocumented immigrants in the Valley sector, Border Patrol spokesman Daniel Tirado said.
CBS News reported that U.S. government investigators say it will cost taxpayers $6.5 billion over the next 20 years to maintain the Mexican border fence.
But as the Obama administration realizes the long-term costs of the border fence, it does not have a way to evaluate whether this investment has helped control illegal entries into the U.S, the Government Accountability Office says in a new report.
The $6.5 billion price tag is in addition to the $2.4 billion that has already been spent to build fence segments along the U.S.-Mexico border. The fence is a Bush administration initiative that has faced several delays and cost increases.

These figures, they say, do not include additional costs such as those associated with fluctuating fuel, labor, and materials prices, or land acquisition costs. The costs of mitigating the environmental damage caused by the wall and related border enforcement activities have not been factored in either.
According to the U.S. Army Corps, maintenance of the border wall in some areas could cost $5 million to $8 million per mile per year!
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that wall maintenance costs will exceed initial construction costs within seven years, not including costs associated with vandalism.

If we assume that over 25 years we spend $75 to $100 billion on the fence, the equipment, maintenance, etc. and estimate that without the new fence 200,000 illegals will arrive annually.
After the fence is built many estimates say the number of illegals entering the U.S. would fall by half, to 100,000. So over 25 years the fence prevented 2.5 million people from coming to America illegally. At $100 billion in cost that comes out to $40,000 per illegal…..at $75 billion the number is $30,000.
8 comments:
Headline makes no damned sense, Juan. You drinking again?
I couldn't agree with you more on this. Republicans are way off on this issue almost as much as Democrats are off on voter ID, abortion, or minimum wage. Unfotunately, politicians vote their party not what is best for all of us.
Deport all infidels with foreign surnames. An old saying by the Republican Party.
How can this " Protective" fence prevent the Nacos from coming to "America ". Aren't we all already in "America". This includes the coon-cap pioneers too.
Obviously, they need to read up on the history of using walls to keep people out. Any idiot knows that a wall only works with land mines and machine gun towers like Berlin.
Maintaining the integrity of the U.S. border will inevitably require a substantial amount of money, whether this involves a 'fence' or not. While a fence may or may not be the best means of securing the border, simply opening the border is not an option. Anyone who does not want the integrity of our border maintained simply hasn't thought through the consequences.
I love the wall but it should have been built up by corpus Christi where the united states starts.
The U. S. begans at the Sarita checkpoint.
Post a Comment