A unanimous Cameron County Commissioners Court rejected two proposals totaling $1.22 million for one vendor without going through the competitive bidding process and ordered that the department head submitting the requests follow the county's purchasing policies.
The items tabled included awarding repairs to the Carlos Tapia Adult Probation Building for $69,126 and a proposal to repairs on the cell doors at the old jail for $1,153,416, both to Hunt and Associates.In neither case had the county officials making the recommendations – Asst. County Administrator David Garcia and his underling Human Resources Director Arnold Flores – processed the proposed projects through the county's competitive bidding process.
In the case of the repairs to the probation building, there was no money in the budget but instead was recommended that lapsed salaries from count departments be used to pay for the repairs.
In the case of the replacement of the cell doors at the old county jail and installation of surveillance cameras and monitors, the money was contained in the department budget.
County Judge Carlos Cascos and the rest of the commissioners questioned Flores and his boss Garcia why only one vendor had been allowed to inspect the proposed work and submit a proposal.Sources close to the commissioners court say that after learning that both projects were about to be let out without any other contractors being informed the work was available, many called their respective commissioners and Cascos to inquire why.
Some commenters in local blogs asked whether an officer in the Sheriff's Department who allegedly had been in the employ as a consultant to Hunt and Associates may have tried to steer the contracts to his former (and some say, current, employer).
"Major Garcia worked for Hunt before going back to work for the county and now Hunt gets a big contract. Well played, Mr. Hunt well played."
He worked at the county jail, then Hunt and right back to county as a supervisor. Even as a current supervisor, he still works part time for Hunt as a consultant....and we wonder why Hunt is getting all the business! How in the heck is this legal? How many more employees are getting their backs scratched by Hunt?
Lie always, this expenditure will be rubber stamped and business will continue as usual. Sickening!!!!"
With this vote to table and open both projects to competitive bidding, a unanimous court may be sending county officials a strong message that the good old days of favoritism and circumventing the process may be over.


































