The Confederacy: In Its Own Words
The desire to preserve slavery was the cause for secession by Southern states.
But 150 years after the war, many continue to cling to myths. As recently as 2011, 48 percent of Americans in a Pew Research Center survey cited states’ rights as the reason for the war, compared to 38 percent citing slavery. This finding is all the more astonishing because a review of statements and documents by Confederate leaders makes their intentions clear. The following is a sample:
"We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable.”
Texas Declaration of causes for secession, February 2, 1861
“Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery — the greatest material interest of the world.”
Mississippi Declaration of causes for secession
“They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man. If their premises were correct, their conclusions would be logical and just but their premise being wrong, their whole argument fails.”
Alexander H. Stephens, Vice President of the Confederacy
Cornerstone Speech, March 21, 1861
Cornerstone Speech, March 21, 1861
“Our new government is founded upon … the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition.”
Alexander H. Stephens, Vice President of the Confederacy
Cornerstone Speech, March 21, 1861
Cornerstone Speech, March 21, 1861
“A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery.”
South Carolina Declaration of causes for secession,
December 24, 1860
December 24, 1860
There are:
- 718 monuments and statues, nearly 300 of which are in Georgia, Virginia or North Carolina;
- 109 public schools named for Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis or other Confederate icons;
- 80 counties and cities named for Confederates;
- 9 official Confederate holidays in six states; and
- 10 U.S. military bases named for Confederates.
But the argument that the Confederate flag and other displays represent “heritage, not hate” ignores the near-universal heritage of African Americans whose ancestors were enslaved by the millions in the South. It trivializes their pain, their history and their concerns about racism — whether it’s the racism of the past or that of today.
(To read full article, click on link below:
8 comments:
You folks just won't let it go, will you. That rock isn't going anywhere and all your chest beating and Tarzan yells about the Confederacy and slavery is not going to change that. The more you whine, the more the people who respect history will resist.
The Southern Poverty Law Center is a far left bunch of loonies. But, I have never seen you post things from people who were not far left loons.
Gosh, this is really one-sided. Morris Dees, the founder of the Southern Poverty Law Center, has enriched himself by picking the pockets of the ill-informed and impressionable individuals who send in their dollars. He is very much like the TV evangelists who prey on the uninformed and dim-witted.
No, no, no! There were other issues in that War!. Take my great-grandfather and his two brothers, who were Confederate cavalrymen. Federal marauders burned their home-town to the ground and laid waste to their farms. They were small farmers who did not own slaves; but, owing to tariffs designed to favor Northern industries, had to pay more and more for basic farm implements. Yes, they suffered at the hands of the Yankee imperialists, with one brother dying in a federal prison camp and another losing a leg. I honor the heritage of these men and will continue to decorate their graves with the flags of the Confederacy. Any of these idiotitos who would presume to destroy monuments and slander the memories of brave men are simply barking up the wrong tree. If they ever come to the Confederate cemetery where my folks are buried and seek to dishonor their memory, they will have to contend with my wrath, which will see their sweet little nalgas sent packing in a New York minute!
Brownsvile needs you to expose the horror of rotten meat being fed to our children at B.I.S.D or building inspectors being arrested and follow-up stories. At least that's why I come back. This kind of b.s. not even the stupid Herald could fool us into thinking it was important is embarrassing tho' -- I didn't bother to read it.
It is a terrible thing to hate another person because of history. Every country has done it share of wrong and has it share of skeleton's in it's closet.
If people held all the blood, killing and death in Mexico's history against Mexico itself and every Mexican, what a sad and wrong that that would be.
This campaign against the "festering Confederate presence" in Brownsville comes from the hearts of people whose own history is not clean, pure and righteous.
The foolishness, hypocrisy and unfairness of all of this is astounding and I fail to see why even those Confederate haters don't see this. I wonder how many of them would like the history of their ancestors held under such an intense scrutiny for faults, sins, failing and wrong doings.
There is the festering Mexican presence down here, a legacy of corruption, criminal behavior, ignorance, illiteracy and poverty. Should we turn the spot light of purity and righteousness on that?
To anon -- April 25, 2016 at 11:39 AM
I hope you start a blog of your own I want to read more! Straight up real talk to this blog's writer and that rock hating guy - with all due respect to Mr. Montoya. Another reason I come back - to read the comments and I see the rock haters have all but disappeared and if they haven't I hope they come back to make funny comments we can laugh at.
They sure tried blowing that rock in the park thing out of proportion.
KBRO... I enjoy reading Mr. Montoya's blog. There are times he shows flashes of brilliance in his writings about people and events in the past. He is a very good story teller. When he can rise above his ridiculous out of date Marxist ideology and his petty feuds with other bloggers, he can say something of worth and merit. I believe he fancies himself some sort of crusader for the public good and he could be that, were he more dedicated to facts and less dedicated to his ideology.
He is in the last analysis a good writer with something to say, if he could just escape the decades old far left wing trap he is in. He is seriously in need of freshening up his critical thinking skill. He writing skills however are first rate.
Mr Castillo and his small gaggle of rock haters have lost the battle. Folks of far greater consequence then them, have already decided the rock stays.
To anonymous April 25, 2016 at 11:39 AM
Well said!
Post a Comment