Monday, April 15, 2019

REDFISH RECYCLING MAKES CASE FOR TRASH CONTRACT, BUT DID IT HAVE EXPERIENCE, EQUIPMENT TO SERVICE CONTRACT?

Image result for redfish recycling


Attorney consultation pursuant to Section 551.071(1)-(2), Texas Gov't Code, to receive legal advice and counsel in connection with proposals for commercial and industrial solid waste collection services requested under RFP#CIS-47-0917, threatened litigation regarding the proposal process, and related legal issues pertaining to the City's rights, duties, privileges, and obligations. (City Manager’s Office – 15 mins.) Agenda item for Tuesday's city commission meeting.

SUMMARY OF TIMELINE OF EVENTS

Date                Event                                                                                                  

11/18/17          REDFISH RECYCLING, INC. (“REDFISH”) Submitted Response
                        to Request for Proposal No. CIS-47-0917 concerning the Term
                        Contract for Commercial and industrial Solid Waste Collection
                        Services for the City of Brownsville (the “RFP”)                                          

 3/19/18           Received letter from CITY OF BROWNSVILLE (“COB”) stating
                        REDFISH was the highest ranked proposer and was asked to submit
                        additional information to verify REDFISH was “responsive and
                        responsible” in order to proceed with negotiation of contract.  REDFISH
                        submits responses to satisfy COB’s request for additional information.    

4/19/18            Received draft contract from the COB for review
                        with the specifications changed                                                                      

4/20/18            Negotiation Meeting Held with REDFISH President, DEAN
                        PUTEGNAT (“PUTEGNAT”), REDFISH Vice-President,
                        KENT LONGLEY (“LONGLEY”), COB Purchasing Director
                        ROBERT LUNA (“LUNA”) and Purchasing Agent JOSE PEREZ
                        (“PEREZ”).  COB agreed to change the contract specifications back to
                        what was presented in the RFP.  PUTEGNAT sent email communication                                              summarizing what was discussed at the Negotiation Meeting as
                        requested by COB                                                                                          

5/14/18            Despite the agreement reached by the parties at the Negotiation Meeting,
                        the COB presented REDFISH with a “final” contract with the COB’s
                        changes to the original specifications contained in the RFP still
                        included therein to sign and return within two (2) days.  These unilateral
                        and material changes made by the COB to the contract resulted in a
                        greater than $61.0 MILLION difference from the contract that was
                        presented in the RFP.                                                                                     

5/15/18            REDFISH sent various emails and made various telephone calls
                        to the COB’s Purchasing Department requesting a meeting to discuss
                        the unilateral changes to the contract and clarify any miscommunication
                        between the parties                                                                                         6                     
5/16/18            PUTEGNAT receives the following response from LUNA regarding
                        previous requests for a meeting:  “We are in receipt of your email
                        dated on May 15, 2018 and have reviewed your request.  At this time,
                        the timeline previously stated [Thursday May 17, 2018 @ 2pm]
                        is still in effect.”  Additionally, LUNA continued to advise that all
                        communication should be directed only through the purchasing office
                        and any attempt to communicate with other city representatives may be
                        interpreted as lobbying                                                                                   

5/17/18            REDFISH Attorney C. FRANK WOOD (“WOOD”) sent letter to
                        LUNA advising of issues and concerns with COB’s actions in
                        unilaterally altering the RFP, acceptance of original contract as
                        presented in the RFP, and due process issues with the procedure
                        being followed by the COB throughout the RFP process                               

5/22/18            PUTEGNAT has telephone conversation with PEREZ attempting
                        to explain why the COB’s unilateral changes to material aspects of
                        the RFP made it such that no company could accept those terms
                        and perform at a profitable level.  PUTEGNAT sent email
                        communication summarizing said telephone conversation                             

5/22/18            REDFISH retains procurement law expert, attorney JEFF CHAPMAN                                        (“CHAPMAN”), with the Chapman Law Firm of Austin, Texas

5/25/18            CHAPMAN sent letter to LUNA concerning procurement law
                        with respect to material changes in the specifications of a request
                        for proposal after responses to the request have been received and
                        highest ranked proposer has been selected                                                     

5/25/18-          REDFISH called COB Purchasing Department twice a week in an
6/14/18            effort to schedule a meeting or obtain a response

6/14/18            REDFISH again sends email requesting a meeting with the COB
                        to discuss RFP after receiving no response to CHAPMAN’s
                        initial letter                                                                                                      

6/15/18            REDFISH has last meaningful communication with the COB
                        wherein LUNA advises PUTEGNAT that he will not longer
                        communicate with him because “a lawyer is involved, so now
                        your lawyer has to talk to our lawyer”

6/15/18-          WOOD attempts to contact interim COB Attorney TIMOTHY
7/17/18            SAMPECK to schedule a meeting, but receives no response

6/20/18            REDFISH sent a spreadsheet illustrating the effect on the Franchise
                        Fee with CPI increases versus no CPI increases to the COB                         

7/17/18            CHAPMAN sent letter to acting COB attorney CHARLIE ZECH
                        (“ZECH”) with Denton Navarro Rocha Bernal & Zech P.C. requesting
                        a meeting with the City Manager to discuss the RFP, problems with the
                        COB’s unilateral change in the terms of the RFP, and the unorthodox
                        procedure being followed by the COB                                                          

8/21/18            CHAPMAN sends email to ZECH again requesting a meeting
                        with the City Manager and regarding the COB’s lack of responsiveness
                        to any inquiries and requests for communication                                           

8/22/18            CHAPMAN receives an email response from ZECH that the City
                        Manager informed ZECH he expects the “issue” to be placed on
                        an upcoming City Commission Agenda, and “very likely the first
                        [City Commission] meeting in September”                                                    

8/22/18            CHAPMAN receives last meaningful communication from ZECH
                        or anyone else on behalf of COB

11/2/18            PUTEGNAT, LONGLEY and WOOD meet with newly hired
                        City Attorney, RENE DE COSS (“DE COSS”), to discuss concerns
                        with the procurement process and actions of the COB

11/8/18            REDFISH discovers the COB had commenced negotiations with second
                        highest ranked bidder some months prior and without sending notice of
same to REDFISH

12/7/18            REDFISH receives correspondence from LUNA stating the COB is
                        again altering the material terms of the RFP.  However, these new
                        proposed changes were different from the COB’s prior changes and
                        could be agreed upon by REDFISH                                                              

12/17/18          REDFISH submits its Best and Final Offer to the COB in response to
                        LUNA’s December 7, 2018 correspondence, accepting all of the latest
                        changes by the COB without reservation or limitation                                   

2/5/19              CITY COMMISSION holds Executive Session and then votes to accept
                        staff’s recommendation as made in Executive Session without any
                        presentation or discussion of said item

2/5/19              REDFISH discovers the COB has purportedly awarded the Term
                        Contract for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Collection
                        Services to the second highest ranked bidder, REPUBLIC SERVICES

2/6/19              REDFISH files Notice of Protest with the COB supported by this
                        Timeline of Events and Exhibits 1-17 (attached hereto without exhibits)          

2/22/19            LUNA sends REDFISH a response to the Notice of Protest                          

2/26/19            Meeting held with DE COSS, COB Manager NOEL BERNAL
                        (“BERNAL”), PUTEGNAT and WOOD to discuss protest

3/11/19            CHAPMAN sends Correspondence to DE COSS to recap telephone
                        conference, explain COB’s violations of applicable procurement law,
                        re-iterate REDFISH’s financial capabilities.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

That's hilarious. I don't in no way think Tiger Woods deserves to be awarded the Medal of Freedom, but it's so Trump to hi-jack Wood's moment. It pretty much cheapens the award. If anybody disagrees, I'd really like to know their reasoning. BTW, I'm a Conservative and not a Trump basher, but I question this move. He won a golf tournament, not solved Middle East peace.

Anonymous said...

Like Richard Branson said...

If you your tasked with an opportunity you don't know how to do - take it and learn later... He created Virgin Atlantic.

Or you can go the other route - if you don't have the experience, you can't have it.. Thats Juan Montoya's way.. he created ElRrun Rrun,

Who would you listen to?

Anonymous said...

Another model laundry? They were there for a very long time without bidding.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like the makings of a lawsuit, because the people at the city are simply stupid.

josey wales said...

CM Bernal do what is right for the community and not local politicians, so are you going to pull them pistols or whistle Dixie?

Anonymous said...

This is what happens when you have incompetent yes-men in Purchasing. Looks like things haven't changed with the new city manager.

Anonymous said...

It sounds like Mr. Luna was pulling for somebody else and tried to railroad the contract.

Anonymous said...

someone clarify...

Who got the bid?

Anonymous said...

total Copy & Paste. Lazy today, Montoya? LOL

chuy chorizo said...

Juan i have to agree with 7.35 am, looks like we got ourselvess a disappointing NEW CITY MANAGER in NOEL BERNAL, vale caca

Anonymous said...

Corporate welfare recipients

Anonymous said...

Small towns normally don't go out on bids that's where the new city manager comes from SMALL TOWNS...

Anonymous said...

Vote everybody out this is bull shit

Anonymous said...

What ever happened to the dam they closed some years back and the city I think took legal action to open the dam.

Anonymous said...

Looks like a wonderful city hall Royal goof up, from purchasing all the way up to the new CM NB, remember small towns dont put this out for bids, they just give it to their compadres, nice lawsuit coming around the corner. out of my way loco, what was Noel Bernal thinking? Or was he set up by those boys over at the purchasing dept? MMM? makes you think about it right?

Anonymous said...

@April 15, 2019 at 2:57 PM
You are the joke racist republican

rita