(In light of the Metropolitan Planning Organization's deliberations Wednesday on a plan by the Cameron County Regional Mobile Authority to build a West Loop project for years, a toll road running along an eight-mile stretch of the old Pacific Union Railroad bed, from the B&M Bridge to approximately the 77/83 Flea Market, we publish the following comments by anti-toll road activist Linda Forse and then an article by the Austin American Statesman on the company that stands to profit the most from the undertaking, the giant HNTB Corporation. "There would be a dangerous domino effect, which I call the Brownsville bypass. The toll road would bypass Brownsville hotels, restaurants and retail stores, especially those along the 77/83 corridor. Travelers to and from Mexico would simply bypass Brownsville, spending their money in Harlingen. Who profits from this undertaking? The giant Kansas-based engineering firm of HNTB is the only one that stands to win in this game and is pushing hard to make the Brownsville toll road happen. The company and its executives have given more than $500,000 to the Republican Governors Association and Governor Rick Perry's campaigns as well as hiring two Perry cronies as lobbyists. Their lobbying efforts and campaign donations have paid off. Texas has paid HNTB more than $160 million over three years, all in no-bid contracts for professional services."What is the gist of your concerns? Local interests, not out-of-state corporate interest, must determine Brownsville's future and prevail over HNTB's history of political and corporate corruption and prevent wasteful spending of public funds.)
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
a federal audit has found that Texas improperly contracted with the engineering firm HNTB to manage hundreds of millions of dollars worth of hurricane recovery grants, and it recommends the state be required to pay back $9 million in overcharges billed by the firm and paid in federal dollars.
The report by the regional inspector general for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development said the Texas Department of Rural Affairs also acted improperly last year when it more than doubled the size of HNTB's contract from $69 million to $144 million and expanded the scope of its work.
Auditors said the state did not adequately monitor the firm and billings that contained "inflated" and "unreasonable" labor costs.
In a series of exclusive articles beginning last fall, the American-Statesman reported that the state had outsourced the public works portion of hurricane recovery to HNTB and focused attention on the high administrative costs of the outsourcing and the lack of oversight of the HNTB contract by the state.
The results of the audit are no surprise to Gary Hagood, deputy commissioner of financial management at the state's General Land Office, which inherited the troubled program from the now-defunct Department of Rural Affairs.
HUD has been closely monitoring Texas for more than a year and has expressed concern about the rapid depletion of federal money needed to administer the disaster grants to communities stricken by hurricanes Ike and Dolly, and the slow pace of construction.
"I'm happy they (the inspector general's office) did what they did," Hagood said after the audit was released last week. "The state didn't do a good job — we're doing better now. We're changing everything."
Hagood canceled the original HNTB contract in August 2011, but the company hasn't stopped working on the program. It continues to administer the HUD infrastructure grants under a different contract with the land office, which has authorized work orders for HNTB totaling up to $13.5 million through June.
Officials said they have not changed contractors because it would only cause more delays for towns still trying to finish their projects.As for the $9 million repayment sought by HUD auditors, Hagood said that is "under negotiation. That's about all I can tell you right now."
Asked why the state does not seek reimbursement from HNTB, Hagood said, "We could." But his aim, he said, is to avoid a monetary penalty altogether.
"They wanted the contract to be managed," Hagood said. "We know how to do contracts at the GLO. We follow all the rules. We're making this happen. Don't penalize us."
In a statement issued Friday, HNTB said the firm had fully complied with the terms of its contract with the rural affairs agency and that concerns identified in the federal audit have since been addressed by the land office.
HNTB "cooperated fully with the auditing process," the statement said."The Hurricane Recovery program remains on target and on budget, and HNTB is proud of the work we are doing for the state of Texas," said the company, which is based in Kansas City, Mo., and is well-connected to Gov. Rick Perry's administration.
In fact, various delays — including a disagreement between state and federal officials over guidelines for the housing portion of the program — have put the recovery effort two years behind schedule.
Perry's office has said the governor had no involvement in the HNTB contract.In its report, the inspector general said the state didn't follow its own procurement rules, which ensure that it pays "fair and reasonable" prices for services and which prohibit substantially altering the scope of a contract without first reopening the solicitation to other vendors.
Based on invoices the auditors sampled, the company submitted only summary invoices for its work, without supporting documentation. When they examined the actual labor costs, auditors found that instead of using the standard federal multiplier of 147 percent, HNTB "stated that it multiplied the total average hourly rate for each position by 320 percent. As a result, we determined that all of its invoices contained inflated costs."
As the American-Statesman also has reported, the state arrangement with HNTB began to unravel last year.
Charlie Stone, the former executive director of the Department of Rural Affairs, laid off half his staff in February 2011 and outsourced to HNTB the management of $1.4 billion in HUD grants for counties that suffered damages during the 2008 hurricanes.
The federal money is meant for new infrastructure — everything from emergency generators to new water treatment facilities.
5 comments:
It is naive to believe that this short toll-road will break Brownsville. Most from Mexico will not pay a toll for such a short distance and will realize it is not a real time saver. The real problem is that this road has been pushed down the throat of the taxpayers and is really an insignificant short-cut except for truck and other commercial traffic. This "short-cut" helps little, is opposed by most local taxpayers, and seems to be a boondoggle project by Rick Perry and his cronies. Rick Perry is a crook and is getting wealthy selling out Texas and Texas taxpayers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P81rxNV4JhQ
mierda mierda y mas mierda!!!1
...would be great IF the Cameron County Commissioners, local state legislators, federal legislators and candudates for THESE offices would use their influence to STOP the toll road/road, and then support Brownsville's envionmental/economic vision that does NOT include a toll road/road, and instead sees a hiking, walking, birding, biking trail in its place ....
Just get rid of the whole RMA bullshit. It is nothing more than Perry's plaything to funnel money to Danenbaum and HNTB in return for heavy political back-scratching.
Post a Comment