Here we go again.
Frank Yturria calls his book about Don Francisco Yturria "The Patriarch" even though he knows that the original Yturria and his wife were never able to conceive children.
Today's Yturrias are the offspring of a second child that the couple adopted after paying his mother compensation. A first adopted child died.
How Frank could have conceived of the title "The Patriarch" for a man who had no blood children has never been questioned by those fawning over this millionaire pillar of the community.
Carl Chilton, too, has single-handedly taken over the task of glorifying local families and personages that are obliquely related to Anglo settlement in South Texas. He, as did other local historians like the late Bruce Aiken, has made it his life's work to mythologize pedestrian characters that slinked their way through our historical panorama and explode their achievement way out of proportion.
Whether it's Charles Stillman, Richard King, Mifflin Kenedy, or other early Robber Barons, if we believe this coffee-table historians, they walked on water and gave alms to the poor.
I don't know how many times we have called on local writers and the local daily to stop propagating myths that make their way to the news columns of the newspaper where they are taken as truth. Perpetrating these fibs is not only intellectually dishonest, it also keep the population in ignorance of the real truth.
Here's one example. In the June 9, 2013 Brownsville Herald, Chilton once again weasel-words his historical column to say this:
"In 1883,a young Army medical officer, William Crawford Gorgas, arrived at Ft. Brown, where he encountered yellow fever for the first time. The cause of the disease was not known. Gorgas treated his patients with whiskey, brandy, and mustard seed. He studied the disease and began research which several years later led to the discovery that yellow fever was carried by the mosquito."
Now, notice that Chilton doesn't say that Gorgas discovered that mosquitoes were the carriers. Instead, he says that Gorgas' research "led to the discovery" several years later.
It is a lie.
Chilton knows it. The medical community know it. And the editors of the newspaper should also know it.
Why are they allowing this drivel to pass off as history? Why is that Big Lie still etched in the marker in front of the Arnulfo Oliveira Student Union Center at Texas Southmost College? Why is the Gorgas Society at the college still permitted to repeat these ignorant statements?
The real discoverer that the disease was carried by mosquitoes was Dr. Carlos Juan Finlay, a Cuban, or to be more PC, an Hispanic.
His discovery led researchers like Walter Reed and other leading medical investigators of the time to re-examine their thinking and consider Finlay's meticulous research.
The Philip S. Hench Yellow Fever Collection web page states that:
"For twenty years of his professional life, renowned Cuban physician and scientist Carlos J. Finlay stood at the center of a vigorously debated medical controversy. The etiology of yellow fever – its causes and origins – had puzzled medical practitioners since the earliest recorded cases of the disease in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
Periodic epidemics of yellow fever ravaged the population of Finlay's native Cuba, particularly affecting the citizens of Havana, where he set up a medical practice in 1864. Finlay was intensely interested in epidemiology and public health, and his initial work on cholera – the result of a severe outbreak of the disease in Havana in 1867 – challenged the perceived wisdom of medical authorities.
His conclusion that the disease was waterborne, though later verified, was rejected by publishers at the time. Finlay soon afterwards began research on yellow fever, publishing his first paper on it in 1872. Here the same keen observations and logical deductions which informed his analysis of cholera lead him to propose in 1881 that the Culex mosquito be "hypothetically considered as the agent of transmission of yellow fever."
(By the way, Gorgas received a medical degree from New York's Bellevue Hospital Medical College in 1876 and joined the U.S. Army Medical Corps in 1880, eight years after Finlay published his first research paper on yellow fever linking mosquitoes to the transmission of the disease. He didn't get to Ft. Brown until 1882 and stayed until 1884.)When the Walter Reed Yellow Fever Commission decided to test the mosquito theory, Finlay provided the mosquitoes, and with the Commission's first scientifically valid success, Walter Reed wrote triumphantly, "The case is a beautiful one, and will be seen by the Board of Havana Experts, today, all of whom, except Finlay, consider the theory a wild one!"
The full run of experiments at Camp Lazear vindicated Finlay's two-decade-long struggle. In the glow of that early success, Reed acknowledged that "it was Finlay's theory, and he deserves much for having suggested it."
Gorgas, who later applied the results of the experiments to a public health campaign which made possible the construction of the Panama Canal, characterized Finlay's contribution in this way: "His reasoning for selecting the Stegomyia as the bearer of yellow fever is the best piece of logical reasoning that can be found in medicine anywhere."
20 comments:
Chilton and his racist views are so disgusting they make me litteraly I'll. Here in 21st century we have a propaganda machine that reinterprets history to the Anglo gain. How unsavory this demon is. And to think that UTB/TSC paid to publish his so-called books. And who was asked to verify his history? None other than majority historian Anthony Knopp. The single Latino historian allowed to review a draft copy said no don't publish this! It was published anyway!
Carl Chilton is read by "literate winter Texans". Period. Everybody else either skips the page or uses it for t-paper. Believe it or not, JMON.
Jake.
Losers seem to feel a duty to try and pull winners down to their level. Human nature is not pretty.
In my lifetime, I have watched Brownsville go from an Anglo run town to a Mexican run town. The change has not resulted in a better run town or a better place to live.
This fact, while not popular to acknowledge, is indeed a fact. We are now just a suburb of Matamoros and would have been so a hundred years sooner, if it was not for the detested pinche gringos. They kept us from fulfilling our destiny, such as it is.
"June 10, 2013 at 11:43 AM"
Written by a pinche Mexicano, para acabarla de chingar.
F--K history---written by white trash to make themselves important.
Just read about the REAl history of the riff-raff that came on the Mayflower---rejects.
Fast-forward to today and the ancestors of these criminals call themselves blue-bloods.(go figure)
Anthony Knopp and all the other wannabe historians can all go F--K themselves. Yes they know our history--NOT.
Bola de rateros cabrones descalsos- they come here and think they know what our ancestors have lived.
No one reads the slanted trash they write---delusional at best.
Go ahead and attack me F--Ktards.
Nobody is going to attack you are you are already destroying yourself with hate.
I will call into question your understanding of the history of Brownsville and the area. Like it or not, this town was developed by Anglos following the Mexican war of 1846. Prior to that, everything has been in Matamoros. The northern side of the river was occupied by a few large "grantees", their peons, cattle and goats. The common Mexican suffered very much under the heals of the Ricos's boots.
Your Mexican ancestors were either people who oppressed the poor, or poor people who were oppressed by the rich. Like it or not, the Anglos laid the foundation on which your life has been built.
You and those like you are so consumed by hate, you don't even know your own history. Talk about stilted, skewed and whitewashed! Lay the hate down and move forward with life, you and everybody around you will be better off.
STILLMAN WAS A THIEF WHO RIPPED US OFF BY FILING FALSE DEEDS ON LANDS...THAT BELONGED TO OUR FIRST SETTLERS OF BROWNSVILLE AND THIS COUNTY...HE DID NOTHING MORE THAN TO PROFIT OFF THE POOR LAND OWNERS...BY INVESTING THOSE LAND PROFITS INTO HIS RICH BANK THAT WAS NOT EVEN HERE...BUT IN SO CALL NEW YORK...SO SOME WHERE UP NORTH. WHAT HAS THIS SOB DONE FOR BROWNSVILLE AND THIS COUNTY...NOT A F__CKEN THING OTHER THAN SOME BUILDING NAMED AFTER HIM ON WASHINTON STREET...NONE OF HIS RICHESS MAKE IT TO THIS AREA OTHER THAT HIS ASSOCIATES AND FAMILY. WHERE ARE THOSE STILLMAN FAMILIES NOW? AS FAR AS I KNOW...NOT HERE!
AND ALSO THOSE PEOPLE TAKING CREDIT FOR THEIR RICHESS WHO CLAIM BLOOD RELATIONS...WANT US TO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE THE ORIGINAL BLOOD LINE TO THOSE RICHESS... WHEN IN FACT THEY HAVE NO BLOOD OTHER THAN BEING ADOPTED BY THOSE FAMILIES...AND INFACT HISTORY SHOWS THAT THEY DID NOT EVEN OWNED THOSE LANDS ON HWY 77 NORTH...BUT WHERE PURCHASED FROM A VERY KNOWN FAMILY FROM BROWNSVILLE...YOU"LL FIND THIS FACT IN THE BROWNSVILLE HISTORIAN BOOK ON OLD BROWNSVILLE.
BUNCH OF LIES...THAT THESE SO CALL HISTORIAN LIKE TO TELL...LOOK UP THE FACTS BEFORE YOU PRINT THESE LIES....THE ORIGINAL FAMILIES (MEXICO/SPAIN) OF BROWNSVILLE AND THIS COUNTY ARE BEING LEFT OUT OF THE TRUE...PRINT THE TRUE...THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW...TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE CIVIL COURT FIGHT OVER THE LANDS ON SOUTH PADRE ISLAND...WHERE THE LANDS WERE DEEMED TO BELONG TO THE ORIGINAL OWNERS...THESE LANDS WERE ALSO STOLEN...BY THESE RICH PEOPLE WHO CAME TO THE VALLEY TO PROFITS OFF OF THESE POOR HISPANIC OWNED LANDS.
@ June 11,2013 10:51 AM
And you're NOT consumed by hate?
Your condescending and patronizing attitude speaks volumes.
Stop preaching!!!!!!!!!!!
And you DID attack the pos!!!!!
I guess that makes you a F------D.
You folk have an understanding of Brownsville history that is as dishonest and corrupt as your politicians, lawyers and judges. You are a bunch of whiney ass bitches who are pissed over some imaginary wrong done 150 years ago.
Grow up, pull up your pants, quite crying and move on with life. You ancestors were a bunch of huracheros and you wouldn't have a pot to piss in, if the Anglos hadn't give you one.
When Brownsville became a part of the United States, people from all over the world came here. They came from the United STates, France, Spain, Italy and Mexico and built a great city on the Rio Grande. When the Mexican had it all to themselves it was nothing but a brush pile, unfit for people to live in.
The history of Brownsville was written by the people who came here after 1846 and not the people who were here before 1846. The people that were here, had nothing, did nothing and were nothing.
I doubt if any of you can trace your family back that far, as most swam the river in the last 50 years to try and get to a better place. The bridge still has a lane that goes to Mexico, so go back to where your ancestors were and see if the cartels give you as much respect as the gringos have.
Ha-ha-ha--the gringos!!!!! Respect?
Inbreeding much???????????
Your brain seems fried!!!!
Think Deliverance!!!!!!!!!
Always exhibiting the "patron" mentality.
Your trailer park is looking for you.
What are you doing here if we are all so corrupt?
BTW @ June 12, at 3:30 PM
You are too funny!!!!!!!!
Thanks for the laugh!!!!!
The deadliest, foulest, ugliest, dirtiest and foolish animal to threat the Mexican-American race is the brown crab. How nice it is to read someone who seems to be on the outside looking in with a broader perspective has put you culeros in your place.
So Finlay was a "Hispanic" was he. He was born in Cuba, educated in the United States and France, but his parents were French and Scottish.
I don't know what "Hispanic" means. If it means Finlay was a Cuban citizen then he was. If, if means any Spanish or mestizo blood then he was not. But en todos modos, he was not La Raza and I think that is what you are driving at.
So Finlay was a "Hispanic" was he. He was born in Cuba, educated in the United States and France, but his parents were French and Scottish.
I don't know what "Hispanic" means. If it means Finlay was a Cuban citizen then he was. If, if means any Spanish or mestizo blood then he was not. But en todos modos, he was not La Raza and I think that is what you are driving at.
So Finlay was a "Hispanic" was he. He was born in Cuba, educated in the United States and France, but his parents were French and Scottish.
I don't know what "Hispanic" means. If it means Finlay was a Cuban citizen then he was. If, if means any Spanish or mestizo blood then he was not. But en todos modos, he was not La Raza and I think that is what you are driving at.
So Finlay was a "Hispanic" was he. He was born in Cuba, educated in the United States and France, but his parents were French and Scottish.
I don't know what "Hispanic" means. If it means Finlay was a Cuban citizen then he was. If, if means any Spanish or mestizo blood then he was not. But en todos modos, he was not La Raza and I think that is what you are driving at.
What am I doing here? I was born here in 1939. This place is my home and belongs to me as much as it belongs to anybody regardless of ethnic background. Hispanics/Mexicans don't own this place. It is part of the United States of American and open for all Americans to live and work. I am not going to let a few hates drive me from my home. The vast, vast majority of Hispanics are fine and noble people. The haters seem to hang out here and vent their spleen at the legitimate history of this place. You truly are a pathetic bunch of pendejos.
1939???????
Why don't you die already?????
I bet you have that smell of viejo/a seco/a.
Hahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry but Hispanics/Mexicans DO own this place.......puro espanish.
Ahh..more hate! Wishing death on somebody is a bad thing to do. You should go to confession if you can still find the church.
.......
The Mexicans don't own my home, nor the homes of my family, nor the business of my family. Nope you don't own it yet. Anglos have always been a small minority down here, and we like it that way. It is easy to succeed where there is little competition.
Post a Comment