Sunday, April 28, 2024
WHAT IS CITY PROPOSITIONS A AND B ELECTION ALL ABOUT? TUESDAY LAST DAY TO CAST EARLY VOTE
The upcoming May 4, 2024, election will see residents of Brownsville's Extra Territorial Jurisdiction area, also known as the ETJ, voting on Proposition A. Those living in Brownsville city will vote on Propositions A and B. Both initiatives could affect the city and its growth area's development.
Proposition A aims to create the Greater Brownsville Municipal Development District (MDD). The existing sales tax in Brownsville, currently at 8.25 percent. It will not change for city shoppers. But, if both measures pass, the ETJ's (five miles past the city limits) sales tax would increase from 6.25 percent to 6.75 percent.
The MDD would fund various projects, such as infrastructure development, park and recreational facility upgrades, (hike-and-bike trails for Rose), job training, small business development, and economic growth. The proposed sales tax increase in the ETJ would mean an extra five cents (0.05₵) on every $10 purchase.
Proposition B suggests ending two voter-approved economic development corporations, the Brownsville Community Improvement Corporation (BCIC) and the Greater Brownsville Incentives Corporation (GBIC). If both propositions pass, it's estimated that an extra $400,000 would be generated annually for economic development and quality of life projects.
The MDD would be managed by a board appointed by the Brownsville City Commission, although he has made public statements saying that the same administration and staffs would remain on the payroll despite their dismal performance in the past. Brownsville City Mayor, John Cowen, Jr., highlighted the importance of the vote, stating that residents can fund future development with the additional funding throughout the City and Cameron County.
Saturday, April 27, 2024
TUESDAY IS LAST DAY FOR EARLY VOTING: HAVE YOU VOTED?
THE ORIGIN OF THE "TEXAS HAND" STRATEGY TO ANNEX TERRITORIES
Special to El Rrun-Rrun
The earliest Anglo-American colonization in imperial Mexican Texas under the Spanish crown took place in 1820, but just one year after Mexico gained its independence, halting negotiations between empresarios like Moses Austin, the father of the so-called "Father of Texas" Stephen S. Austin.
After that, Anglo-Americans settlements under the new government took place between 1821 and 1835 despite Mexico's passing laws in 1830 to stop the flood of settlers that swarmed across the Sabine River without any authority and soon became a majority, bolstered by a slave population they brought with them.
Spain had been unable to persuade its own citizens to move to remote and sparsely populated Texas and there were only three settlements in the province of Texas in 1820: Nacogdoches, San Antonio de Béxar, and La Bahía del Espíritu Santo (later Goliad), small towns with outlying ranches.
As early as the 1790s, Spain invited Anglo-Americans to settle in Upper Louisiana (Missouri) for the same reason. The foreigners were to be Catholic, industrious, and willing to become Spanish citizens in return for generous land grants. Mexico continued the Spanish colonization plan after its independence in 1821 by granting contracts to empresarios who would settle and supervise selected, qualified immigrants.
(A reader has pointed out, correctly, that the Mexican government altered some of its requirements to allow settlers of other faiths to continue their religious private worship and to own slaves under promise of manumission at a given period of time. The original 300 settlers who came with Austin were joined by two other groups to total near 1,000.)
Alarmed at the huge number of Anglo-Americans and slaves and the settlers' who professed to be Catholic but refused to convert and refusal to pledge loyalty to Mexico, the new government sent a fact-finding commission to investigate the situation, which was getting out of control with a rebellion in the offing.The settlers – with the encouragement of expansionists like Andrew Jackson and other national figures – then called for U.S. military intervention to protect their "rights.
Jackson, who was responsible for the removal of natives tribes in Florida despite the Supreme Court's ruling that the tribes owned the land, was responsible for the Trail of Tears. To this day, some Native Americans refuse to accept $20 bills bearing his image.
Thus, the so-called "Texas Hand" strategy was born which called for the illegal settlement of Texas by southerners, a declaration of independence against the Mexican government for the "tyrannical" treatment of illegal white settlers, and the taking of their property (slaves), and calls for the U.S. to come to their aid. It was to serve the blueprint for the United States to eventually annex California and, later, northern California and Oregon from the British.
Jackson and supporters of the land grab of Mexican territories based their claim to the territory charging that Texas had been American territory all along and had been erroneously ceded to Spain with under the Onís-Adams Treaty of 1819 and ratified in 1821. Under the treaty, the United States and Spain defined the western limits of the Louisiana Purchase and Spain surrendered its claims to the Pacific Northwest. In return, the United States recognized Spanish sovereignty over Texas.
Alarmed at the flood of Anglo-American illegal migration, the Mexican government in 1827 named
General Manuel de Mier y Teran to lead a scientific and boundary expedition into Texas to observe the natural resources and the Indians, to discover the number and attitudes of the Americans living there, and to determine the United States-Mexico boundary between the Sabine and the Red rivers.
"The Texas Department is in contact with a nation which has shown itself to be rapacious for land," he wrote. "While the world has taken little notice, the norteamericanos have grabbed all land that has been within their reach and in less than half a century have become owners of extensive colonies that belonged to Spain and France and of vast distant regions belonging to an infinity of native tribes which have since disappeared from the face of the earth."
Mier y Terán continued to be concerned over the inability of incoming American settlers to assimilate into the Mexican culture. In 1832, he grew despondent over the problems of colonization in Texas and the continuing political problems on both the state and national levels and the increasing influx of Anglo-American settlers after abrogation of the Law of 1830, the general committed suicide by falling on his sword behind the church of San Antonio in Padilla, Tamaulipas.
Friday, April 26, 2024
THE TENNESSEE CONNECTION: JACK DANIELS, THE TEXAS "FORMULA" AND LEX, THE SNOWBIRD
I met Lex (I can't recall his last name) a few years ago.
I had stumbled into the old Frontier Lounge when it used to front Washington Street on one of those hot, late fall/early winter afternoons when temperatures in the 80s are not uncommon. It is now a segunda, a second-hand store.
Having acquired a taste for old country music from the years I spent in the military in North Carolina and as a child the Midwest, I noticed an old-time Victrola jukebox and sauntered over to see their selection. I plunked a few quarters in the slot (they actually took quarters back then) and punched in some Johnny Horton, Hank Williams (Sr.), George Jones (Mr. Jones to you) and, of course, Patsy Cline.
One of those was Lex, a strapping, ruddy 6'5" open-faced farm boy who walked over to the corner table where I was sitting with his hand outstretched in greeting.
Turned out Lex was wintering in Brownsville with his mother and was staying at a trailer park on Boca Chica Blvd. just before you go to the airport.
"I guess you haven't heard of too many folks coming all the way down here from our neck of the woods?" he joked.
I thought about that for a while and told him that historically, the state of Tennessee had provided many personages that figured prominently in the development of Texas.
Lex was intrigued when I told him that the reason he was sitting in a bar in Brownsville, Texas talking to someone in English was because of another Tennessean, James K. Polk, the nation's 11th president. Although he wasn't born in Tennessee, he moved there as a young man and quickly became a popular politician.
He was elected to the Tennessee House of Representatives from 1823 to 1825, served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1825 to 839, was Speaker of the House from 1835 to 1839 and was later elected Governor of Tennessee and served from 1839 to 1841.
While he was the speaker, he was the floor leader of President Andrew Jackson's fight against the U.S. Bank. That relationship was to serve Polk well in his quest to the U.S. presidency.
I explained that both men were ardent expansionists, with Jackson eyeing Texas as the next logical step for the nation to annex, while Polk wanted California as the next U.S. acquisition. Polk served as president from 1845 to 1849, and the "Texas question" played a large role in getting Jackson's endorsement in his bid for office.
I told Lex that author a writer named Walter R. Borneman in his book, "POLK: The Man Who Transformed the Presidency and America," makes clear that the traditional view of Polk as a warmonger whose embrace of Manifest Destiny prompted his invasion of a peaceful nation without any provocation is too simplistic.
This line of thinking has been the thrust of historians like John D. Eisenhower (So Far From God: The U.S. War with Mexico, 1846-1848), and earlier, of iconoclasts like Bernard De Voto (The Year of Decision: 1846). Both these works made Polk out to be the quintessential imperialist set to grab as much real estate as he could by force of arms, if need be.
But Borneman makes clear that there were many forces at work that prompted Polk to order Zachary Taylor and the U.S. Army from Fort Jasper, in Louisiana, to the mouth of the Nueces and then to the Rio Grande.
To begin with, when the presidential aspirants to the Democratic nomination of 1844 were quizzed on their stand on the annexation of Texas, only Polk responded in the affirmative.
John Quincy Adams, who only 17 years before the declaration of the Republic of Texas in 1836, had negotiated the Adams-Onis Treaty recognizing the territory as part of Mexico, came out publicly against its annexation.
With no one else championing Texas, the Manifest Destiny mantle fell comfortably on Polk’s shoulders. Before then, the petition by the Texans (Sam Houston, of Tennessee, was president) for annexation by the U.S. was rejected twice by the previous administrations. Even after Texas declared her independence in 1836, the president and the Congress refused to act and risk the eruption of a civil war over the slavery question, which eventually did happen.
Former president Andrew “Old Hickory” Jackson, Sam Houston, Polk, and even Crockett, who had served in the U.S. Congress with Polk, got in the picture.
Houston, who left Tennessee after a failed marriage, would later go on to be president of the Republic of Texas and maintained a running correspondence with both Jackson and Polk.
Houston was riled because twice he had proposed U.S. presidents and the U.S Congress to annex Texas as a state, and had been left at the altar twice. But with Jackson’s encouragement from The Hermitage and Polk’s platform for annexation, he was dissuaded from encouraging closer ties between the Texas Republic and Britain and assured that annexation would occur once Polk took over the presidency.
In fact, Jackson Andrew Donelson - Jackson’s nephew and Polk confidant - was quickly named charge d’affaires to Texas after the death from yellow fever of Tilghman A. Howard. Donelson, another Tennessean, was to deliver Polk’s message to Gov. Houston that help was on the way.
"So you see," I told Lex, "you're not the first resident of the Volunteer State to look our way. We just wish you had brought your friend Jack Daniels instead of Zachary Taylor."
"Amen to that," Lex laughed.
In the years after that initial encounter with Lex, I found out through friends he had reunited with his estranged wife, was still raising horses in Tennessee and had become a member of the Opossum Society of the United States (He claimed that the American possum was the most misunderstood marsupial in the world).
I'll probably never hear from again, but he, like his fellow Tennesseans before him, sure stirred shit up.
Thursday, April 25, 2024
TEXAS DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE SIGNED BY ILLEGAL ALEINS
El Paso
I heard a commercial for one of our excellent and beloved clients.
What caught my ear was an offer for “a free copy of the Texas Declaration of Independence”. I know our governor is currently locking horns with the federal administration but…has it gotten to the point that Texas has drafted a new Declaration of Independence?
Investigation further, I’m PRETTY sure they’re talking about the Texas Declaration of Independence of 1836, when Texas declared its independence from Mexico. But, as read more and more about that document, I discovered a fact that you may not have learned in state history class.
The Texas Declaration of Independence was signed by predominantly illegal aliens.
Let’s go back in time to March 2, 1836. The Texas Revolution was fully underway. In fact, the Battle of the Alamo was still being fought in San Antonio. The Alamo wouldn’t be captured until 4 days later on March 6.
While that was happening in San Antonio 160 miles away in Washington-on-the-Brazos, Texas a meeting was convened to adopt a formal declaration of independence from Mexico. In all, 60 men signed the document. Most of the 60 were illegally in the country of Mexico (Texas).
Here’s how this worked. All but three of the signatories had moved to Texas from the United States. Only ten of them had lived in Texas for more than six years. Fully one quarter of the rest had only come to the Mexican province of Texas within the previous year.
Here’s why that’s significant. Mexico had passed a law in 1830 that explicitly banned any further immigration to Texas from the U.S.
This means that, by Mexican Law, almost ALL of the men who signed the Texas Declaration of Independence were ILLEGAL ALIENS!
What does this mean to us? It all depends on your perspective. The message COULD be, “Be kinder to (illegal) immigrants because that’s who founded Texas”. OR…the message could be, “Don’t let illegal immigrants in or they’ll steal part of your country!” It’s all in how you look at it.
AMERIKA, WHERE ARE YOU NOW? DON'T YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS...
Charges were dropped against 46 individuals after defense attorneys raised concerns about “deficiencies” in charging documents known as arrest affidavits, Travis County Attorney Delia Garza said Thursday in a text message.
IF YOU DON'T VOTE, YOU CAN'T COMPLAIN OF THE RESULTS
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
TRUMP IN CONTEMPT FOR STABBING COHEN WITH BIC PEN
La Cebolla
NEW YORK—Violating the judge’s order prohibiting the former president from killing his one-time fixer, Donald Trump was held in contempt of court Tuesday after stabbing Michael Cohen to death with a ballpoint pen.
“Though this court exercised leniency when the defendant strangled the witness known as Stormy Daniels with his bare hands, let this be a warning to the offending party that any further murders will not be tolerated. Defendant Donald Trump is hereby ordered to pay a fine of $1,000 for each day he continues to use an office writing implement to mutilate the late Mr. Cohen before finally leaving him for the vultures.”
At press time, Judge Merchan claimed failure to comply with the contempt ruling — which bars Trump from desecrating the corpse of his former lawyer with whatever office supplies he has on hand during the trial — could result in probation.
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
IES CFO GONZALEZ PLEADS GUILTY TO FEDERAL CHARGES OF CONSPIRACY, EMBEZZLEMENT: GALLEGOS' TRIAL SEPT. 3
Special to El Rrun-Rrun
Gallegos Sr. and his son Gallegos Jr. pleaded not guilty with conspiracy and theft concerning programs receiving federal funds. They are currently in the process of discovery and jury selection is currently scheduled for Sept. 3.
The are also accused in their indictment of misapplying millions of dollars in federal grant funds meant to be used for temporarily housing migrant children at IES, a nonprofit. The Brownsville Herald's Mark Regan reported that IES abruptly shuttered its doors and fired all of its employees on March 31, 2018, although neither the federal government or IES explained why the nonprofit suddenly closed.
The Herald filed a successful Freedom of Information Act request with the Office of Refugee Resettlement’s Administration for Children & Families for communication between those agencies and IES following the closure and also reviewed years of IES tax documents.
Th newspaper reported at the time that the information revealed how the organization used millions of dollars in federal grant monies, including that IES employees profited from leased properties owned by its executives and that those executives paid themselves salaries that were more than federal grant rules allowed.
“Ruben Gallegos Sr. and Juan Jose Gonzalez approved less-than-arms-length transactions in which IES used federal grant funds to pay for multiple leases on the same properties that were owned by Ruben Gallegos Sr., or related entities, in order to inflate rental income paid with federal grant funds to Ruben Gallegos Sr.,” the indictment stated.
That 13-page indictment also alleges they purchased a $1 million San Benito property and falsely claimed it was operational and would serve more than 1,000 children in Fiscal Year 2015.
“The IES San Benito Shelter was not operational during FY-2015,” the indictment stated.
THE EVOLUTION OF A BUS SHELTER ON OLD PORT ISABEL ROAD
Construction was scheduled to begin in November and was expected to be completed in either June or July 2023. Well, it's now May 2024, and, according to the city they're coming, aunque sea en burro.
The addition of the new bus shelters was discussed and approved at a May 3, 2022 city commission meeting. The city has 600 bus stops and of that number 100 have some kind of shelter. The new coverings were to be 5-feet-by-10-feet prefabricated bus shelters.
“We understand the need for additional bus shelters. The City has a couple hundred bus stops and we are prioritizing shelters as quickly as possible. We had eight new much-needed shelters go up recently in the Southmost area and will be constructing 30 more this coming year,” said then Brownsville Mayor Trey Mendez.
The solar powered bus shelters were heralded to include benches, USB chargers, solar lighting, advertising space and a space to identify a passenger’s route map and bus schedule times. Also, they were to have sidewalks, ADA ramps and concrete pads.
ART OF THE DEAL: MAGA DUPES, HAVE I GOT A NICE HAT FOR YOU!
Monday, April 22, 2024
ENJOY AND CELEBRATE MOTHER EARTH WHILE WE STILL CAN
EARLY VOTING FOR MAY 28 DEMOCRATIC RUNOFF (MAY 20-24). *PLEASE NOTE RUNOFF RACES NOT ON THE BALLOT TODAY
EARLY VOTING FOR MAY 4 ELECTIONS (MONDAY APRIL 22- APRIL 30)
Sunday, April 21, 2024
U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES UNCONSTITUTIONAL; LIKENS IDENTICAL HELEN RAMIREZ SCHEME TO "EXTORTION"
By Juan Montoya
Just four days after the United States Supreme Court declared traffic impact fees as a condition of issuing building permits on new residential housing and and commercial development assessed by El Dorado County in California unconstitutional, the City of Brownsville Commission passed an identical ordinance on first reading.
The second and final reading is scheduled for the city commission's May 7 regular meeting.
A second reading will amend Ordinance Number 2024-1739 – Chapter 314-Impact Fees, Article V-Impact Fees, Roadway Capital Recovery Fee – to establish the 2023 Brownsville Roadway Capital Recovery Fee (CRF) and its integration into Chapter 314-Impact Fees as part of the city's code of ordinances. It is part of the city's Road Capital Improvement Program.The city commission unanimously approved the amendment to the ordinance during a regular meeting on April 16 on the recommendation of Eddie Haas, a consultant from Freese and Nichols Inc. of Ft. Worth, members of the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee, and city manager Helen Ramirez, unaware that four days before, on April 12, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that traffic impact fees were unconstitutional and vacated and remanded and overturned a decision of the the Third Appellate District in the case Sheetz vs. County of El Dorado, California.
The traffic impact fees contained under the proposed amendment to the ordinance by the City of Brownsville are identical to those of El Dorado County in California. It establishes categories and rate schedules for private dwellings and commercial development and establishes different zones for the fee schedule. City building permits for new development – both residential and commercial – are conditioned on the payment of the Capital Recovery Fees (CFR).
In the Sheetz case, the fee was part of a “General Plan” enacted by the County’s Board of Supervisors to address increasing demand for public services spurred by new development. The fee amount was not based on the costs of traffic impacts specifically attributable to Sheetz’s particular project, but rather was assessed according to a rate schedule that took into account the type of development and its location within the county, identical to Brownsville's CFR scheme. Sheetz was required by the County of El Dorado to pay a $23,420 traffic impact fee before it would grant him a residential building permit for his new building.Under a project called Capital Recovery Fee, people applying for building permits will be assessed an average of $2,000 to pay for an estimated $27 million the city wants to have in an account to be ready for an expected increase in population estimated at more than 248,600 by 2033, compared to a little more than 211,000 today.
The number of units are projected to rise from 61,018 now to 75,702 by the year 2033. The fees would change as the plan calls for dividing the city into 19 sections.
For a large commercial business, such as a big box measuring 159,000-square-foot, the fee would be $31,000 or more.
Saturday, April 20, 2024
DERBEZ'S "RADICAL": ART IMITATING LIFE, OR LIFE IMITATING ART?
On their first day sixth grade, the students of Jose Urbina Lopez Elementary School in the Mexican border city of Matamoros find their new teacher rolling on the floor surrounded by overturned desks.
They’re not desks, he exclaims. They’re lifeboats.
So begins Christopher Zalla’s “Radical,” an inspirational based-on-a-true-story drama about an unconventional teacher named Sergio Juarez Correa (Eugenio Derbez). His day-one lesson is ultimately about buoyancy. But the metaphor isn’t hard to grasp. In Lopez’s classroom, education is a life raft.
“Radical,” though, isn’t set at an inner-city school in Los Angeles, New Jersey or Paris, like those films are. Matamoros, along the Rio Grande and across from Brownsville, Texas, is considered a lawless place, known for extreme violence and migrant encampments. “Radical” is also set in 2011, among the bloodiest years of Mexico’s drug war.
Sergio’s self-empowering method is to allow kids to follow their curiosity and find answers for themselves. They’re skeptical at first but soon are engaged and excited by their freedom to lead their own learning. More than once, Sergio says the students don’t even really need him.
There are plenty of familiar beats as the school year moves along. Sergio’s ways draw the ire of other teachers. Parents are distrustful, wondering if he’s giving kids facing a harsh future false hope. But while “Radical,” an audience winner at the Sundance Film Festival, is formulaic in its approach, it gets enough out of it likable cast to earn at least a passing grade
Derbez, the Mexican actor and comedian, already made an impression in the classroom as the encouraging music teacher of best picture-winning "CODA." Here, he takes center stage, playing Sergio with a winning sincerity and full-bodied resistance to the rules.
Three of the students are brought into focus: Paloma (Jennifer Trejo), a math whiz with astronaut dreams who lives beside the landfill her father works at; Lupe (Mia Fernanda Solis), a budding philosopher whose pregnant mother expects her to help with childcare; and Nico (Danilo Guardiola), a plucky kid who’s being trained by a local dealer as a drug courier.
Their stories are never quite at the center of “Radical,” which sticks closest to its star teacher. But each young actor is natural, particularly Trejo. Her real-life character, Paloma Noyola Bueno, was the central figure in a Wired article that “Radical” is partially derived from.
But the best relationship captured in “Radical” is the one between Sergio and the school’s cautious, less energetic principal Chucho (a wonderful Daniel Haddad). He at first seems like an impediment to Sergio, warning him not to “kick the hornet’s nest.” But before long, he’s a co-conspirator, willing to — in a further experiment on buoyancy — cannonball into a cold tub. Together, Derbez and Haddad help make “Radical” float, too.